When Prevention Promotes Creativity: The Role of Mood, Regulatory Focus, and Regulatory Closure

被引:226
作者
Baas, Matthijs [1 ]
De Dreu, Carsten K. W. [1 ]
Nijstad, Bernard A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Dept HRM & Org Behav, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
regulatory focus; motivation; mood; activation; creativity; POSITIVE AFFECT; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; MOTIVATIONAL CUES; IDEA GENERATION; HEDONIC TONE; DUAL PATHWAY; PERFORMANCE; ACTIVATION; EMOTION; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1037/a0022981
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Promotion-focused states generally boost creativity because they associate with enhanced activation and cognitive flexibility. With regard to prevention-focused states, research evidence is less consistent, with some findings suggesting prevention-focused states promote creativity and other findings pointing to no or even negative effects. We proposed and tested the hypothesis that whether prevention-focused states boost creativity depends on regulatory closure (whether a goal is fulfilled or not). We predicted that prevention-focused states that activate the individual (unfulfilled prevention goals, fear) would lead to similar levels of creativity as promotion-focused states but that prevention-focused states that deactivate (closed prevention goals, relief) would lead to lower levels of creativity. Moreover, we predicted that this effect would be mediated by feelings of activation. Predictions were tested in 3 studies on creative insights and 1 on original ideation. Results supported predictions. Implications for self-regulation, motivation, mood, and creativity are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:794 / 809
页数:16
相关论文
共 127 条
[1]   The Dark Side of Creativity: Biological Vulnerability and Negative Emotions Lead to Greater Artistic Creativity [J].
Akinola, Modupe ;
Mendes, Wendy Berry .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2008, 34 (12) :1677-1686
[2]  
Amabile T.M., 1996, Creativity in context: The social psychology of creativity
[3]   Implicit regulatory focus associated with asymmetrical frontal cortical activity [J].
Amodio, DM ;
Shah, JY ;
Sigelman, J ;
Brazy, PC ;
Harmon-Jones, E .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 40 (02) :225-232
[4]   AROUSAL AND THE INVERTED-U HYPOTHESIS - A CRITIQUE OF NEISS RECONCEPTUALIZING AROUSAL [J].
ANDERSON, KJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1990, 107 (01) :96-100
[5]   TIME PRESSURE AND PERFORMANCE OF SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS - 5-YEAR PANEL STUDY [J].
ANDREWS, FM ;
FARRIS, GF .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1972, 8 (02) :185-200
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1999, HDB PERSONALITY THEO
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1970, MANUAL STATE TRAIT I
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1945, Psychological Monographs
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Handbook of social psychology
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2007, SOCIAL PSYCHOL HDB B