High dose-rate afterloading 192Iridium prostate brachytherapy:: Feasibility report

被引:172
作者
Mate, TP [1 ]
Gottesman, JE [1 ]
Hatton, J [1 ]
Gribble, M [1 ]
Van Hollebeke, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Med Ctr, Seattle Prostate Inst, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1998年 / 41卷 / 03期
关键词
brachytherapy; implant; prostate; cancer; iridium; high dose rate;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00097-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Results from localized prostate cancer series using seed implants have been most encouraging. However, with current techniques,inadequate dosimetry sometimes occurs. Remote afterloading high dose rate (192)Iridium brachytherapy (HDR-Ir192) theoretically remedies some potential inadequacies of seed implantation by performing the dosimetry after the needles are in place. This study was undertaken to determine the feasibility of incorporating multifractionated HDR-Ir192 in the brachytherapy management of prostate carcinoma. Methods: From October 1989 to August 1995, 104 patients were treated with a combination of multifractionated HDR-Ir192 and external beam. Patients ranged in age from 48-78 years, with a mean of 68.6 years. By TNM clinical stage, there were 1 T1b, 31 T1c, 28 T2a, 24 T2b, 9 T2c, 8 T3a, and 3 T3c lesions. For the group, the mean initial pretreatment PSA was 12.9 ng/ml (median 8.1), with 90% of the patients having had a pretreatment PSA greater than a normal value of 4.0 ng/ml. Patients with prostate volumes up to 105 cc were implanted. Treatment was initiated with perineal needle placement using ultrasound guidance. A postoperative CT scan was obtained to provide the basis for treatment planning. Four HDR-Ir192 treatments were given over a 40-h period, with a minimal peripheral dose (MPD) ranging from 3.00 to 4.00 Gy per fraction over the course of this study. Two weeks later, external beam radiation was added using 28 fractions of 1.80 Gy daily, to a dose of 50.40 Gy. Results: Follow-up ranged from 10 to 89 months, with a mean of 46 months and median of 45 months. At various follow-up points, the patient numbers at risk were: 1 year, 101; 3 years, 69; 5 years, 28. The technique proved to be uniformly applicable to a wide range of prostate volumes and was very well tolerated by patients. Nearly all significant late in-field treatment complications were genitourinary in nature. Of the patients, 6.7% developed urethral strictures that were readily manageable. Changes in technique implemented in 1993 appear to have significantly lessened the incidence of this complication. Two patients developed significant uropathy within the first treatment year, but bath resolved; 1 of these 2 patients had a prior TURP. Other. bladder or rectal complications have been minimal. Using PSA progression as a marker of tumor response, approximately 84% of patients whose initial PSA was less than 20 ng/ml were free of progression at 5 years by actuarial analysis. Conclusions: We found the use of transperineal ultrasonography, postimplant CT-based dosimetry, coupled with adjustable dose delivery inherent to remote afterloading technology, to give unparalleled control in performing this complex brachytherapy task. Thus, it may be advantageous in certain clinical situations where the resultant MPD is needed to reliably cover the target volume, such as in patients with carcinomas at base locales, when the possibility of moderate to extensive intraprostatic tumor exists, and in patients with large glands. Early PSA data suggest that it may be effective as a definitive treatment with rates of-adverse late tissue effects that are acceptable using current technique and doses described herein. Longer follow-up is needed to ascertain its position among the various treatment regimens for prostate carcinoma. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 533
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
BERTERMANN H, 1990, BRACHYTHERAPY, P281
[2]   Biochemical disease-free survival following I-125 prostate implantation [J].
Beyer, DC ;
Priestley, JB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (03) :559-563
[3]   Should brachytherapy be considered a therapeutic option in localized prostate cancer? [J].
Blasko, JC ;
Ragde, H ;
Luse, RW ;
Sylvester, JE ;
Cavanagh, W ;
Grimm, PD .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1996, 23 (04) :633-+
[4]  
BLASKO JC, 1991, SCAND J UROL NEPHROL, P113
[5]   Equivalent biochemical failure-free survival after external beam radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy in patients with a pretreatment prostate specific antigen of >4-20 ng/ml [J].
DAmico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Kaplan, I ;
Beard, C ;
Jiroutek, M ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Wein, A ;
Coleman, CN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (05) :1053-1058
[6]   THE EFFECT OF LOCAL-CONTROL ON METASTATIC DISSEMINATION IN CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE - LONG-TERM RESULTS IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH I-125 IMPLANTATION [J].
FUKS, Z ;
LEIBEL, SA ;
WALLNER, KE ;
BEGG, CB ;
FAIR, WR ;
ANDERSON, LL ;
HILARIS, BS ;
WHITMORE, WF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (03) :537-547
[7]   FAILURE OF OPEN RADIOACTIVE I-125 IMPLANTATION TO CONTROL LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER - A STUDY OF 41 PATIENTS [J].
GOTTESMAN, JE ;
TESH, DG ;
WEISSMAN, WD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 146 (05) :1317-1320
[8]   Conformal technique dose escalation for prostate cancer: Biochemical evidence of improved cancer control with higher doses in patients with pretreatment prostate-specific antigen >=10 ng/ml [J].
Hanks, GE ;
Lee, WR ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Hunt, M ;
Kaplan, E ;
Epstein, BE ;
Movsas, B ;
Schultheiss, TE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 35 (05) :861-868
[9]   TRANSPERINEAL I125 SEED IMPLANTATION IN PROSTATIC-CANCER GUIDED BY TRANS-RECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY [J].
HOLM, HH ;
JUUL, N ;
PEDERSEN, JF ;
HANSEN, H ;
STROYER, I .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1983, 130 (02) :283-286
[10]   EXTERNAL BEAM IRRADIATION VERSUS 125-IODINE IMPLANT IN THE DEFINITIVE TREATMENT OF PROSTATE CARCINOMA [J].
KOPROWSKI, CD ;
BERKENSTOCK, KG ;
BOROFSKI, AM ;
ZIEGLER, JC ;
LIGHTFOOT, DA ;
BRADY, LW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (04) :955-960