Duty to directly communicate radiologic abnormalities: Has the pendulum swung too far?

被引:9
作者
Berlin, L
机构
[1] Rush N Shore Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Skokie, IL 60076 USA
[2] Rush Med Coll, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.181.2.1810375
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 381
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
*AM COLL RAD, 1995, STAND, P5
[2]  
*AM COLL RAD, 2002, STAND 2002 2003, P3
[3]  
American College of Radiology, 1999, STAND QUAL ASS PROC, P1
[4]  
American College of Radiology, 1991, STAND
[5]   Communication of the significant but not urgent finding [J].
Berlin, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (02) :329-331
[6]   Communication of the urgent finding [J].
Berlin, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (03) :513-515
[7]   Malpractice issues in radiology - The miasmatic expert witness [J].
Berlin, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (01) :29-35
[8]   Malpractice issues in radiology - Bearing false witness [J].
Berlin, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 180 (06) :1515-1521
[9]   Standard of care [J].
Berlin, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 170 (02) :275-278
[10]   Malpractice issues in radiology - Communicating findings of radiologic examinations: Whither goest the radiologist's duty? [J].
Berlin, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (04) :809-815