Appendicitis outcomes with increasing computed tomographic scanning

被引:34
作者
Frei, Steven P. [1 ]
Bond, William F. [1 ]
Bazuro, Robert K. [2 ]
Richardson, David M. [1 ]
Sierzega, Gina M. [3 ]
Reed, James F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Lehigh Valley Hosp Muhlenberg, Emergency Dept, Bethlehem, PA 18017 USA
[2] Danbury Hosp, Emergency Dept, Danbury, CT USA
[3] Lehigh Valley Hosp, Allentown, PA 18105 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2007.06.027
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to examine appendicitis outcomes over time as computed tomographic (CT) scanning was incorporated into practice. Basic Procedures: Using chart review, appendectomy cases from 1998 to 2004 were analyzed by year for CT scanning rate, delay in treatment, complications, negative appendectomies, and time to surgery. Delay in treatment was defined as discharge from the ED at first visit or more than 20 hours from examination until surgery. Main Findings: Computed tomographic scanning increased from 12.3% in 1998 to 84.4% in 2004. Delay in treatment decreased from 7.8% in 1998 to 3.0% in 2004. Complications decreased from 33.3% in 1998 to 21.3% in 2004. Negative appendectomy rate did not change significantly over time. There was a slight decrease that may have resulted from chances, variation (p = .087) for the line trend. Median time to surgery increased from 250 minutes in 1998 to 426 minutes in 2002, decreasing to 370 minutes by 2004. Conclusion: During the period when CT scanning increased dramatically, delays in treatment and complications decreased significantly, but negative appendectomy rates decreased only slightly, if at all. Median time to surgery increased. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 44
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Unenhanced helical CT scanning of the abdomen and pelvis changes disposition of patients presenting to the emergency department with possible acute appendicitis [J].
Christopher, FL ;
Lane, MJ ;
Ward, JA ;
Morgan, JA .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 23 (01) :1-7
[2]  
DeArmond Gregory M, 2003, Surg Infect (Larchmt), V4, P213, DOI 10.1089/109629603766957013
[3]   Diagnostic value of unenhanced helical CT in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis [J].
Ege, G ;
Akman, H ;
Sahin, A ;
Bugra, D ;
Kuzucu, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2002, 75 (897) :721-725
[4]   Evaluating diagnostic accuracy in appendicitis using administrative data [J].
Flum, DR ;
Koepsell, TD .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2005, 123 (02) :257-261
[5]   Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis [J].
Flum, DR ;
Morris, A ;
Koepsell, T ;
Dellinger, EP .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 286 (14) :1748-1753
[6]   Impact of abdominal CT Imaging on the management of appendicitis: An update [J].
Fuchs, JR ;
Schlamberg, JS ;
Shortsleeve, MJ ;
Schuler, JG .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2002, 106 (01) :131-136
[7]   False-negative and false-positive errors in abdominal pain evaluation: Failure to diagnose acute appendicitis and unnecessary surgery [J].
Graff, L ;
Russell, J ;
Seashore, J ;
Tate, J ;
Elwell, A ;
Prete, M ;
Werdmann, M ;
Maag, R ;
Krivenko, C ;
Radfor, M .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2000, 7 (11) :1244-1255
[8]   Clinical guidelines, computed tomography scan, and negative appendectomies: a case series [J].
Harswick, C ;
Uyenishi, AA ;
Kordick, MF ;
Chan, SB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 24 (01) :68-72
[9]  
Hershko DD, 2002, AM SURGEON, V68, P1003
[10]  
Hong John J, 2003, Surg Infect (Larchmt), V4, P231, DOI 10.1089/109629603322419562