Effect of biosolid incorporation on arsenic distribution in Mollisol soils in central Chile

被引:13
作者
Ascar, Loreto [1 ]
Ahumada, Ines [1 ]
Richter, Pablo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chile, Fac Ciencias Quim & Farmaceut, Dept Quim Inorgan & Anal, Santiago, Chile
关键词
arsenic; soil; biosolid; fractionation;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.08.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The effect of biosolid incorporation on arsenic distribution in Mollisol soils in central Chile was studied. Two soils were sequentially extracted for arsenic with a five-step method that accounts for the following arsenic forms: non-specifically adsorbed (F1), specifically adsorbed (F2), amorphous and poorly crystallized Fe and Al oxides (H), well-crystallized Fe and Al oxides (F4) and residual (F5). The arsenic residual fraction was predominant in Pintue soil, whereas in Graneros soil, arsenic was mostly associated to amorphous Fe and Al oxides. Graneros soil exhibited a higher As(V) adsorbing capacity than Pintue soil, which relates to the higher clay and iron and aluminum oxides contents, confirming that these components participation is essential for the adsorption of this metalloid. Biosolid application at a rate of 100 Mg ha(-1) caused an increase in arsenic bound to amorphous Fe and Al oxides and in the residual fraction, in Pintue soil. When Pintue soil was spiked with arsenic, aged for two months, and treated with biosolid (100 Mg ha(-1)), the content of arsenic in the most labile fractions decreased, thus showing a favorable effect in its application to soils with few specific sites for arsenic adsorption. Arsenic speciation was carried out in the first two fractions of the sequential extraction procedure. As(V) was the main form in both fractions. Biosolid incorporation at a rate of 100 ha(-1) hat caused a significant increase in organic arsenic forms. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1211 / 1217
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ENV CHEM ARSENIC
[2]  
Blakemore L.C., 1987, NZ SOIL BUREAU SCI R
[3]  
*CONAMA, 2001, ANT REGL MAN BIOS PE
[4]  
Day P.R., 1965, METHODS SOIL ANAL 1, P562, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGRONMONOGR9.1.C43
[5]   Arsenate and chromate retention mechanisms on goethite .1. Surface structure [J].
Fendorf, S ;
Eick, MJ ;
Grossl, P ;
Sparks, DL .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 31 (02) :315-320
[6]  
Gao S, 1997, J ENVIRON QUAL, V26, P753, DOI 10.2134/jeq1997.263753x
[7]   Adsorption of arsenate (V) and arsenite (III) on goethite in the presence and absence of dissolved organic carbon [J].
Grafe, M ;
Eick, MJ ;
Grossl, PR .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2001, 65 (06) :1680-1687
[8]   Arsenate and chromate retention mechanisms on goethite .2. Kinetic evaluation using a pressure-jump relaxation technique [J].
Grossl, PR ;
Eick, M ;
Sparks, DL ;
Goldberg, S ;
Ainsworth, CC .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 31 (02) :321-326
[9]   THE FEASIBILITY OF USING SEQUENTIAL EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES FOR ARSENIC AND SELENIUM IN SOILS AND SEDIMENTS [J].
GRUEBEL, KA ;
DAVIS, JA ;
LECKIE, JO .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1988, 52 (02) :390-397
[10]   Arsenic alters the function of the glucocorticoid receptor as a transcription factor [J].
Kaltreider, RC ;
Davis, AM ;
Lariviere, JP ;
Hamilton, JW .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 109 (03) :245-251