Poor competitive fitness of transgenically mitigated tobacco in competition with the wild type in a replacement series

被引:24
作者
Al-Ahmad, H [1 ]
Galili, S
Gressel, J
机构
[1] Weizmann Inst Sci, IL-76100 Rehovot, Israel
[2] Agr Res Org, Volcani Ctr, Agron & Nat Resources Dept, IL-50250 Bet Dagan, Israel
关键词
competitive fitness; gene flow; Nicotiana; replacement series; tandem constructs; transgenic mitigation;
D O I
10.1007/s00425-005-1540-6
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Transgenic crops can interbreed with other crop cultivars or with related weeds, increasing the potential of the hybrid progeny for competition. To prevent generating competitive hybrids, we previously tested tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) as a model for validating the transgenic mitigation (TM) concept using tandem constructs where a gene of choice is linked to mitigating genes that are positive or neutral to the crop, but deleterious to a recipient under competition. Here, we examine the efficacy of the TM concept at various ratios of transgenically mitigated tobacco in competition with the wild type tobacco in an ecological replacement series. The dwarf/herbicide-resistant TM transgenic plants cultivated alone under self-competition grew well and formed many more flowers than the tall wild type, which is an indication of greater reproductivity. In contrast to the wild type, TM flowering was almost completely suppressed in mixed cultures at most TM/wild type ratios up to 75% transgenic, as the TM plants were extremely unfit to reproduce. In addition, homozygous TM progeny had an even lower competitive fitness against the wild type than hemizygous/homozygous TM segregants. Thus, the TM technology was effective in reducing the risk of transgene establishment of intraspecific transgenic hybrids at different competitive levels, at the close spacing typical of weed populations.
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 385
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Tandem constructs to mitigate transgene persistence: tobacco as a model [J].
Al-Ahmad, H ;
Galili, S ;
Gressel, J .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2004, 13 (03) :697-710
[2]  
ALAHMAD H, 2005, IN PRESS J PLANT GRO
[3]   DIFFERENTIAL COMPETITIVENESS OF SULFONYLUREA RESISTANT AND SUSCEPTIBLE PRICKLY LETTUCE (LACTUCA-SERRIOLA) [J].
ALCOCERRUTHLING, M ;
THILL, DC ;
SHAFII, B .
WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1992, 6 (02) :303-309
[4]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[5]   Costs of resistance: A test using transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana [J].
Bergelson, J ;
Purrington, CB ;
Palm, CJ ;
LopezGutierrez, JC .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 263 (1377) :1659-1663
[6]  
BRANDEL JE, 1993, CROP SCI, V338, P847
[7]  
Carney SE, 1996, EVOLUTION, V50, P1871, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03574.x
[8]   FUN WITH MUTANTS - APPLYING GENETIC METHODS TO PROBLEMS OF WEED PHYSIOLOGY [J].
CHRISTIANSON, ML .
WEED SCIENCE, 1991, 39 (03) :489-496
[9]   ECOLOGICAL FITNESS OF SENECIO-VULGARIS AND AMARANTHUS-RETROFLEXUS BIOTYPES SUSCEPTIBLE OR RESISTANT TO ATRAZINE [J].
CONARD, SG ;
RADOSEVICH, SR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1979, 16 (01) :171-177
[10]   Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops [J].
Daniell, H .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2002, 20 (06) :581-586