Impact of candesartan on nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure

被引:48
作者
Demers, C
McMurray, JJV
Swedberg, K
Pfeffer, MA
Granger, CB
Olofsson, B
McKelvie, RS
Östergren, J
Michelson, EL
Johansson, PA
Wang, DL
Yusuf, S
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2, Canada
[2] Univ Glasgow, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[6] AstraZeneca Res & Dev, Molndal, Sweden
[7] Karolinska Hosp, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
[8] AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE USA
[9] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London WC1, England
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2005年 / 294卷 / 14期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.294.14.1794
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce the risk of myocardial infarction (MI), but it is not known whether angiotensin receptor blockers have the same effect. Objective To assess the impact of the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan on MI and other coronary events in patients with heart failure. Design, Setting, and Participants The Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity (CHARM) program, a randomized, placebo-controlled study enrolling patients (mean age, 66 [SD,11] years) with NewYork Heart Association class II to IV symptoms who were randomly allocated to receive candesartan (target dose, 32 mg once daily) or matching placebo given in addition to optimal therapy for heart failure. Patients were enrolled from March 1999 through March 2001. Of 7599 patients allocated, 4004 (53%) had experienced a previous MI, and 1808 (24%) currently had angina. At baseline, 3125 (41%) were receiving an ACE inhibitor; 4203 (55%), a beta-blocker; 3153 (42%), a lipid-lowering drug; 4246 (56%), aspirin; and 6286 (83%), a diuretic. Main Outcome Measure. The primary outcome of the present analysis was the composite of cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI in patients with heart failure receiving candesartan or placebo. Results During the median follow-up of 37.7 months, the primary outcome of cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI was significantly reduced in the candesartan group (775 patients [20.4%]) vs the placebo group (868 [22.9%]) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.96; P=.004; number needed to treat [NNT], 40). Noonfatal MI alone was also significantly reduced in the candesartan group (116 [3.1%]) vs the placebo group (148 [3.9%]) (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60-0.98; P=.03; NNT, 118). The secondary outcome of fatal MI, sudden death, or nonfatal MI was significantly reduced with candesartan (459 [12.1%]) vs placebo (522 [13.8%]) (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.97; P=.02; NNT, 59). Risk reductions in cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI were similar across predetermined subgroups and the component CHARM trials. There was no impact on hospitalizations for unstable angina or coronary revascularization procedures with candesartan. Conclusion In patients with heart failure, candesartan significantly reduces the risk of the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI.
引用
收藏
页码:1794 / 1798
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Braunwald E, 2004, NEW ENGL J MED, V351, P2058
  • [2] *CONS TRIAL STUD G, 1987, NEW ENGL J MED, V326, P1429
  • [3] Effects of ramipril on coronary events in high-risk persons - Results of the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study
    Dagenais, GR
    Yusuf, S
    Bourassa, MG
    Yi, QL
    Bosch, J
    Lonn, EM
    Kouz, S
    Grover, J
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (05) : 522 - 526
  • [4] Effects of losartan and captopril on mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAL randomised trial
    Dickstein, K
    Kjekshus, J
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 360 (9335) : 752 - 760
  • [5] Long-term ACE-inhibitor therapy in patients with heart failure or left-ventricular dysfunction:: a systematic overview of data from individual patients
    Flather, MD
    Yusuf, S
    Kober, L
    Pfeffer, M
    Hall, A
    Murray, G
    Torp-Pedersen, C
    Ball, S
    Pogue, J
    Moyé, L
    Braunwald, E
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 355 (9215) : 1575 - 1581
  • [6] Fox KM, 2003, LANCET, V362, P782
  • [7] Comparison of candesartan, enalapril, and their combination in congestive heart failure - Randomized evaluation of strategies for left ventricular dysfunction (RESOLVD) pilot study - The RESOLVD pilot study investigators
    McKelvie, RS
    Yusuf, S
    Pericak, D
    Avezum, A
    Burns, RJ
    Probstfield, J
    Tsuyuki, RT
    White, M
    Rouleau, J
    Latini, R
    Maggioni, A
    Young, J
    Pogue, J
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (10) : 1056 - 1064
  • [8] MCMURRAY J, IN PRESS J AM COLL C
  • [9] Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and non-ACE dependent angiotensin II generation in resistance arteries from patients with heart failure and coronary heart disease
    Petrie, MC
    Padmanabhan, N
    McDonald, JE
    Hillier, C
    Connell, JMC
    McMurray, JJV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 37 (04) : 1056 - 1061
  • [10] EFFECT OF CAPTOPRIL ON MORTALITY AND MORBIDITY IN PATIENTS WITH LEFT-VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - RESULTS OF THE SURVIVAL AND VENTRICULAR ENLARGEMENT TRIAL
    PFEFFER, MA
    BRAUNWALD, E
    MOYE, LA
    BASTA, L
    BROWN, EJ
    CUDDY, TE
    DAVIS, BR
    GELTMAN, EM
    GOLDMAN, S
    FLAKER, GC
    KLEIN, M
    LAMAS, GA
    PACKER, M
    ROULEAU, J
    ROULEAU, JL
    RUTHERFORD, J
    WERTHEIMER, JH
    HAWKINS, CM
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 327 (10) : 669 - 677