Validation of ozone monitoring instrument nitrogen dioxide columns

被引:181
作者
Celarier, E. A. [1 ]
Brinksma, E. J. [2 ]
Gleason, J. F. [3 ]
Veefkind, J. P. [2 ]
Cede, A. [4 ]
Herman, J. R. [3 ]
Ionov, D. [5 ,6 ]
Goutail, F. [6 ]
Pommereau, J. -P. [6 ]
Lambert, J. -C. [7 ]
van Roozendael, M. [7 ]
Pinardi, G. [7 ]
Wittrock, F. [8 ]
Schoenhardt, A. [8 ]
Richter, A. [8 ]
Ibrahim, O. W. [9 ]
Wagner, T. [10 ]
Bojkov, B. [4 ]
Mount, G. [11 ]
Spinei, E. [11 ]
Chen, C. M. [12 ]
Pongetti, T. J. [12 ]
Sander, S. P. [12 ]
Bucsela, E. J. [4 ]
Wenig, M. O. [4 ]
Swart, D. P. J. [13 ]
Volten, H. [2 ,13 ]
Kroon, M. [2 ]
Levelt, P. F. [2 ]
机构
[1] SGT Inc, Greenbelt, MD 20770 USA
[2] Royal Netherlands Meteorol Inst, NL-3730 AE De Bilt, Netherlands
[3] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[4] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, GEST Program, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA
[5] St Petersburg State Univ, Phys Res Inst, Dept Atmospher Phys, St Petersburg 198904, Russia
[6] CNRS, F-91370 Verrieres Le Buisson, France
[7] Belgian Inst Space Aeron, B-1180 Brussels, Belgium
[8] Univ Bremen, Inst Environm Phys, D-28334 Bremen, Germany
[9] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Environm Phys, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[10] Max Planck Inst Chem, D-55128 Mainz, Germany
[11] Washington State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Lab Atmospher Res, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[12] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, NASA, Div Sci, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
[13] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2007JD008908
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
We review the standard nitrogen dioxide (NO2) data product (Version 1.0.), which is based on measurements made in the spectral region 415-465 nm by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on the NASA Earth Observing System-Aura satellite. A number of ground- and aircraft-based measurements have been used to validate the data product's three principal quantities: stratospheric, tropospheric, and total NO2 column densities under nearly or completely cloud-free conditions. The validation of OMI NO2 is complicated by a number of factors, the greatest of which is that the OMI observations effectively average the NO2 over its field of view (minimum 340 km 2), while a ground- based instrument samples at a single point. The tropospheric NO2 field is often very inhomogeneous, varying significantly over tens to hundreds of meters, and ranges from <10(15) cm(-2) over remote, rural areas to >10(16) cm(-2) over urban and industrial areas. Because of OMI's areal averaging, when validation measurements are made near NO2 sources the OMI measurements are expected to underestimate the ground- based, and this is indeed seen. Further, we use several different instruments, both new and mature, which might give inconsistent NO2 amounts; the correlations between nearby instruments is 0.8-0.9. Finally, many of the validation data sets are quite small and span a very short length of time; this limits the statistical conclusions that can be drawn from them. Despite these factors, good agreement is generally seen between the OMI and ground- based measurements, with OMI stratospheric NO2 underestimated by about 14% and total and tropospheric columns underestimated by 15-30%. Typical correlations between OMI NO2 and ground- based measurements are generally >0.6.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation [J].
Bey, I ;
Jacob, DJ ;
Yantosca, RM ;
Logan, JA ;
Field, BD ;
Fiore, AM ;
Li, QB ;
Liu, HGY ;
Mickley, LJ ;
Schultz, MG .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2001, 106 (D19) :23073-23095
[2]   Intercomparison of SCIAMACHY nitrogen dioxide observations, in situ measurements and air quality modeling results over Western Europe [J].
Blond, N. ;
Boersma, K. F. ;
Eskes, H. J. ;
van der A, R. J. ;
Van Roozendael, M. ;
De Smedt, I. ;
Bergametti, G. ;
Vautard, R. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2007, 112 (D10)
[3]   Validation of OMI tropospheric NO2 observations during INTEX-B and application to constrain NOx emissions over the eastern United States and Mexico [J].
Boersma, K. F. ;
Jacob, D. J. ;
Bucsela, E. J. ;
Perring, A. E. ;
Dirksen, R. ;
van der A, R. J. ;
Yantosca, R. M. ;
Park, R. J. ;
Wenig, M. O. ;
Bertram, T. H. ;
Cohen, R. C. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 42 (19) :4480-4497
[4]  
Boersma K. F., 2002, OMI ALGORITHM THEORE, P15
[5]   Error analysis for tropospheric NO2 retrieval from space -: art. no. D04311 [J].
Boersma, KF ;
Eskes, HJ ;
Brinksma, EJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2004, 109 (D4)
[6]  
Bovensmann H, 1999, J ATMOS SCI, V56, P127, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<0127:SMOAMM>2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]   The 2005 and 2006 DANDELIONS NO2 and aerosol intercomparison campaigns [J].
Brinksma, E. J. ;
Pinardi, G. ;
Volten, H. ;
Braak, R. ;
Richter, A. ;
Schoenhardt, A. ;
van Roozendael, M. ;
Fayt, C. ;
Hermans, C. ;
Dirksen, R. J. ;
Vlemmix, T. ;
Berkhout, A. J. C. ;
Swart, D. P. J. ;
Oetjen, H. ;
Wittrock, F. ;
Wagner, T. ;
Ibrahim, O. W. ;
de Leeuw, G. ;
Moerman, M. ;
Curier, R. L. ;
Celarier, E. A. ;
Cede, A. ;
Knap, W. H. ;
Veefkind, J. P. ;
Eskes, H. J. ;
Allaart, M. ;
Rothe, R. ;
Piters, A. J. M. ;
Levelt, P. F. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2008, 113 (D16)
[9]   Comparison of tropospheric NO2 from in situ aircraft measurements with near-real-time and standard product data from OMI [J].
Bucsela, E. J. ;
Perring, A. E. ;
Cohen, R. C. ;
Boersma, K. F. ;
Celarier, E. A. ;
Gleason, J. F. ;
Wenig, M. O. ;
Bertram, T. H. ;
Wooldridge, P. J. ;
Dirksen, R. ;
Veefkind, J. P. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2008, 113 (D16)
[10]   Algorithm for NO2 vertical column retrieval from the ozone monitoring instrument [J].
Bucsela, EJ ;
Celarier, EA ;
Wenig, MO ;
Gleason, JF ;
Veefkind, JP ;
Boersma, KF ;
Brinksma, EJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 44 (05) :1245-1258