Prevention of nosocomial urinary tract infection in ICU patients - Comparison of effectiveness of two urinary drainage systems

被引:22
作者
Leone, M [1 ]
Garnier, F
Dubuc, M
Bimar, MC
Martin, C
机构
[1] Marseilles Univ Hosp Syst, Nord Hosp, Marseilles Sch Med, Serv Reanimat Polyvalente,Intens Care Unit, F-13915 Marseille 1, France
[2] Marseilles Univ Hosp Syst, Nord Hosp, Marseilles Sch Med, Ctr Trauma, F-13915 Marseille, France
[3] Marseilles Univ Hosp Syst, Nord Hosp, Marseilles Sch Med, Dept Biostat, F-13915 Marseille 1, France
关键词
bacteriuria; closed drainage system; ICU; urinary tract infection;
D O I
10.1378/chest.120.1.220
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objectives: To determine whether the rate of acquisition of bacteriuria differs between the use of a complex closed drainage system (CCDS) with a preattached catheter, antireflux valve, drip chamber, and povidone-iodine releasing cartridge, and a two-chamber open drainage system (TCOS) in ICU patients. Design: Prospective, nonrandomized, controlled trial. Setting: Medical/surgical/trauma ICU in a university hospital. Patients: Two hundred twenty-four ICU patients requiring an indwelling urinary catheter, Intervention: We compared the rate of acquisition of bacteriuria in two groups of consecutive patients (n = 113 and n = 111, respectively) who underwent bladder catheterization with a TCOS during the first 6 months and with a CCDS during the next 6 months. Urinary catheters were managed by a team of trained nurses following the same written protocol, No prophylactic antibiotics were administered, either during management of catheter placements or catheter withdrawal, but 75% of patients received one or more antimicrobial medications for treatment of infected sites other than the urinary tract. Urine samples were obtained weekly for the duration of catheterization and within 24 h after catheter removal, and each time symptoms of urinary infection were suspected. Only patients who required an indwelling catheter for > 48 h were evaluated. Measurements and results: There was no statistical difference in the rate of bacteriuria between the two groups. Bacteriuria occurred in 11.5% and 13.5% of patients, and was diagnosed on day 14 +/- 8 and 13 +/- 9 of catheterization (mean +/- SD) for the TCOS and the CCDS, respectively. A CCDS cost $3 (US dollars) more than the TCOS, Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the effectiveness of a TCOS and a CCDS in ICU patients. No differences were noted between the two systems (alpha = 0.05). The higher cost of a CCDS is not justified for ICU patients.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 224
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条