Safety and efficacy of a novel three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging model for uterine incision in placenta previa

被引:10
作者
Cao, Yanwen [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Yanxing [1 ]
Yu, Yanhong [1 ]
Wang, Zhijian [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] First Peoples Hosp Chenzhou, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chenzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Blood loss; Cesarean delivery; Magnetic resonance imaging; Operative time; Placenta previa; Three-dimensional model; Uterine incision; MRI; HEMORRHAGE; ACCRETA; ULTRASOUND;
D O I
10.1002/ijgo.12311
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
Objective: To assess a novel three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) model for determining position of uterine incision during cesarean delivery among patients with placenta previa. Methods: A prospective study was conducted among women with singleton pregnancies complicated by placenta previa who delivered by cesarean at a hospital in China between January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2016. Patients chose whether to undergo 3D MRI modeling to guide uterine incision (study group) or the standard intervention (control group). Medical records were reviewed to collect data on maternal, neonatal, and operative characteristics. Results: Among 134 women enrolled, 45 were in the study group and 89 in the control group. When compared with the control group, patients in the study group experienced less intraoperative blood loss (678.65649.54 vs 933.96695.25mL; P=0.042) and shorter operative times (65.13 +/- 27.38 vs 86.88 +/- 54.43minutes; P=0.013). Fewer patients in the study group received transfusions (11 [24%] vs 38 [43%]; P=0.038). No between-group differences were found for hysterectomy rate, hospitalization days and cost, or neonatal outcomes. Conclusion: Uterine incision guided by a 3D MRI model could improve maternal outcomes during cesarean delivery, including reductions in intraoperative blood loss, transfusion frequency, and operative time.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 341
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
SONOGRAPHIC PLACENTAL LOCALIZATION IN THE DETERMINATION OF THE SITE OF UTERINE INCISION FOR PLACENTA PREVIA [J].
BOEHM, FH ;
FLEISCHER, AC ;
BARRETT, JM .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 1982, 1 (08) :311-314
[2]
THE ESTIMATION OF BLOOD-LOSS DURING BURNS SURGERY [J].
BUDNY, PG ;
REGAN, PJ ;
ROBERTS, AHN .
BURNS, 1993, 19 (02) :134-137
[3]
COMBS CA, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V77, P77
[4]
Committee on Obstetric Practice, 2012, Obstet Gynecol, V120, P207, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318262e340
[5]
Association of Placental Volume Measured by MRI and Birth Weight Percentile [J].
Derwig, Iris E. ;
Akolekar, Ranjit ;
Zelaya, Fernando O. ;
Gowland, Penny A. ;
Barker, Gareth J. ;
Nicolaides, Kypros H. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 34 (05) :1125-1130
[6]
Prevalence of placenta previa among deliveries in Mainland China: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Fan, Dazhi ;
Wu, Song ;
Wang, Wen ;
Xin, Lihong ;
Tian, Guo ;
Liu, Li ;
Feng, Jinping ;
Guo, Xiaoling ;
Liu, Zhengping .
MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (40)
[7]
Guangdong Health and Family planning Commision, OFF PRIC MED SERV
[8]
Magnetic resonance imaging in 300 cases of placenta accreta: surgical correlation of new findings [J].
Jaraquemada, JMP ;
Bruno, CH .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 84 (08) :716-724
[9]
ACR Guidance Document for Safe MR Practices: 2007 [J].
Kanal, Emanuel ;
Barkovich, A. James ;
Bell, Charlotte ;
Borgstede, James P. ;
Bradley, William G., Jr. ;
Froelich, Jerry W. ;
Gilk, Tobias ;
Gimbel, J. Rod ;
Gosbee, John ;
Kuhni-Kaminski, Ellisa ;
Lester, James W., Jr. ;
Nyenhuis, John ;
Parag, Yoav ;
Schaefer, Daniel J. ;
Sebek-Scoumis, Elizabeth A. ;
Weinreb, Jeffrey ;
Zaremba, Loren A. ;
Wilcox, Pamela ;
Lucey, Leonard ;
Sass, Nancy .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (06) :1447-1474
[10]
Management of urological cancers during pregnancy [J].
Khochikar, Makarand V. .
NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2010, 7 (04) :195-205