Comparison of doses for pulmonary embolism detection with helical CT and pulmonary angiography

被引:25
作者
Resten, A
Mausoleo, F
Valero, M
Musset, D
机构
[1] Hop Antoine Beclere, Serv Radiol, F-92140 Clamart, France
[2] Hop Antoine Beclere, Nucl Med Serv, F-92140 Clamart, France
[3] Off Protect Rayonnements Ionisants, F-78016 Le Vesinay, France
关键词
pulmonary embolism; radiation exposure; lung; CT; pulmonary angiography;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-002-1522-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to compare the radiation exposure delivered by helical CT and pulmonary angiography (PA) for the detection of pulmonary embolism (PE), with an anthropomorphic phantom. A preliminary survey defined a representative standard procedure for helical CT and PA (n=148) by choosing the exposure settings most frequently used. Then, radiation doses were measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters TLD 100 (Lif) introduced into the depth of an anthropomorphic phantom. Average doses were approximately five times smaller with helical CT than with PA (6.4+/-1.5 and 28+/-7.6 mGy, respectively). The most important doses were abreast the pulmonary apex for CT, and abreast the pulmonary arteries for PA. Compared with PA, helical CT dose distribution was relatively uniform (10-13 mGy). Finally, concerning abdomen and pelvis, doses were more important for PA than for CT scan (0.06-2.86 and 0.2-11.5 mGy, respectively). For the diagnostics of PE, radiation exposure is five times smaller with helical CT than with pulmonary angiography.
引用
收藏
页码:1515 / 1521
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   PULMONARY-EMBOLISM - DIAGNOSIS WITH MULTIPLE IMAGING MODALITIES [J].
ALDERSON, PO ;
MARTIN, EC .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 164 (02) :297-312
[2]  
Barkhausen J, 1998, Aktuelle Radiol, V8, P220
[3]  
Becker C, 1999, ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG, V170, P99
[4]  
CHANG LL, 1995, CHUNG HUA I HSUEH TS, V55, P283
[5]  
GEFTER WB, 1995, RADIOLOGY, V197, P261
[6]   An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients [J].
Huda, W ;
Atherton, JV ;
Ware, DE ;
Cumming, WA .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 203 (02) :417-422
[7]   DIAGNOSING PULMONARY-EMBOLISM - NEW FACTS AND STRATEGIES [J].
KELLEY, MA ;
CARSON, JL ;
PALEVSKY, HI ;
SCHWARTZ, JS .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1991, 114 (04) :300-306
[8]   Pulmonary embolism: Prospective comparison of spiral CT with ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy [J].
Mayo, JR ;
RemyJardin, M ;
Muller, NL ;
Remy, J ;
Worsley, DF ;
HosseinFoucher, C ;
Kwong, JS ;
Brown, MJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 (02) :447-452
[9]   Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system [J].
McCollough, CH ;
Zink, FE .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (11) :2223-2230
[10]   THE INCIDENCE, ETIOLOGIES, AND AVOIDANCE OF COMPLICATIONS OF PULMONARY ANGIOGRAPHY IN A LARGE SERIES [J].
MILLS, SR ;
JACKSON, DC ;
OLDER, RA ;
HEASTON, DK ;
MOORE, AV .
RADIOLOGY, 1980, 136 (02) :295-299