Evaluation of residents in professionalism and communication skills in south China

被引:2
作者
Qu, Bo [2 ]
Zhao, Yuhong [3 ]
Sun, Baozhi [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Res Ctr Med Educ, Shenyang 110001, Peoples R China
[2] China Med Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Stat, Shenyang 110001, Peoples R China
[3] China Med Univ, Dept Acad Adm, Sch Publ Hlth, Shenyang 110001, Peoples R China
[4] China Med Univ, Sch Continuing Educ, Shenyang 110001, Peoples R China
关键词
MEDICAL-EDUCATION; PROGRAM; COMPETENCE; VALIDATION; INSTRUMENT; VIEWS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the resident doctors' competency in professionalism and communication skills in south China. Methods: We conducted this cross-sectional study in 8 hospitals, in 4 provinces of southern China from October to December 2007. The evaluation included 148 resident doctors. A 360-degree instrument from Education Outcomes Service Group (EOS group) of the Arizona Medical Education Consortium was developed and used by the attending physicians, residents, and their peers, nurses, patients, and office staff in this study. All data were entered into a computerized database and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows*. Results: Our results indicated that the instruments are internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha >0.90). The principal components analysis with varimax rotation for the attending-, resident self-evaluation, nurse-, patient-, office staff- and resident peer-rated questionnaires explained 70.68%, 76.13%, 77.02%, 76.37%, 75.51%, and 72.05% of the total variance. Significant differences (p<0.05) were found among different evaluators. Conclusions: The 360-degree instrument appears to be reliable in evaluating a residents' competency in professionalism and communication skills. Information from the assessment may provide feedback to residents. Saudi Med J 2010; Vol.31 (11): 1260-1265
引用
收藏
页码:1260 / 1265
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
AbuRuz SM, 2009, SAUDI MED J, V30, P1577
[2]  
Al-Haqwi AI, 2010, SAUDI MED J, V31, P357
[3]  
Al-Naami MY, 2008, SAUDI MED J, V29, P1802
[4]  
Al-Sughayr AM, 2010, SAUDI MED J, V31, P1049
[5]  
Alsalih R, 2009, SAUDI MED J, V30, P1618
[6]   Global minimum essential requirements in medical education [J].
Armstrong, EG ;
Bandaranayake, RC ;
Bosch, AOI ;
Cravioto, A ;
Dohner, C ;
Dunn, MR ;
Gonnella, JS ;
Hamilton, JD ;
Harden, RM ;
Hawkins, D ;
Patiño, JF ;
Schwarz, MR ;
Stern, DT ;
Tuchinda, P ;
van Niekerk, JPD ;
Wojtczak, A ;
Tongfu, Z .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2002, 24 (02) :130-135
[7]  
Azer SA, 2010, SAUDI MED J, V31, P456
[8]  
Bradley K.D., 2008, Journal of College Teaching Learning, V5, P39, DOI [DOI 10.19030/tlc.v5i8.1240, 10.19030/tlc.v5i8.1240, DOI 10.19030/TLC.V5I8.1240]
[9]  
Bryan RE, 2005, ANN ACAD MED SINGAP, V34, P486
[10]   Assessing the assessments: UK dermatology trainees' views of the workplace assessment tools [J].
Cohen, S. N. ;
Farrant, P. B. J. ;
Taibjee, S. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2009, 161 (01) :34-39