Increased tumor establishment and growth after open vs laparoscopic bowel resection in mice

被引:58
作者
Allendorf, JDF [1 ]
Bessler, M [1 ]
Horvath, KD [1 ]
Marvin, MR [1 ]
Laird, DA [1 ]
Whelan, RL [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10032 USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 1998年 / 12卷 / 08期
关键词
laparoscopy; surgery; mouse; tumor establishment; tumor growth; mouse mammary carcinoma;
D O I
10.1007/s004649900775
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Surgery can suppress immune function and facilitate tumor growth. Several studies have demonstrated better preservation of immune function following laparoscopic procedures. Our laboratory has also shown that tumors are more easily established and grow larger after sham laparotomy than after pneumoperitoneum in mice. The purpose of this study was to determine if the previously reported differences in tumor establishment and growth would persist in the setting of an intraabdominal manipulation. Methods: Syngeneic mice received intradermal injections of tumor cells and underwent either an open or laparoscopic cecal resection. In study 1, the incidence of tumor development was observed after a low dose inoculum; whereas in study 2, tumor mass was compared on postoperative day 12 after a high-dose inoculum. Results: In study 1, tumors were established in 5% of control mice, 30% of laparoscopy mice, and 83% of open surgery mice (p < 0.01 for all comparisons). In study 2, open surgery group tumors were 1.5 times as large as laparoscopy group tumors (p < 0.01), which were 1.5 times as large as control group tumors (p < 0.02). Conclusion: We conclude that tumors are more easily established and grow larger after open laparoscopic bowel resection in mice.
引用
收藏
页码:1035 / 1038
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   A murine model of laparoscopic-assisted intervention [J].
Allendorf, JDF ;
Bessler, M ;
Whelan, RL .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1997, 11 (06) :622-624
[2]   Better preservation of immune function after laparoscopic-assisted vs open bowel resection in a murine model [J].
Allendorf, JDF ;
Bessler, M ;
Whelan, RL ;
Trokel, M ;
Laird, DA ;
Terry, MB ;
Treat, MR .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1996, 39 (10) :S67-S72
[3]  
ALLENDORF JDF, 1995, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V130, P649
[4]   RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS MINI CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
BARKUN, JS ;
BARKUN, AN ;
SAMPALIS, JS ;
FRIED, G ;
TAYLOR, B ;
WEXLER, MJ ;
GORESKY, CA ;
MEAKINS, JL .
LANCET, 1992, 340 (8828) :1116-1119
[5]   TRADITIONAL VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
GADACZ, TR ;
TALAMINI, MA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 161 (03) :336-338
[6]   REDUCED POSTOPERATIVE HOSPITALIZATION AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
GRACE, PA ;
QUERESHI, A ;
COLEMAN, J ;
KEANE, R ;
MCENTEE, G ;
BROE, P ;
OSBORNE, H ;
BOUCHIERHAYES, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (02) :160-162
[7]  
REDDICK E J, 1989, Surgical Endoscopy, V3, P131, DOI 10.1007/BF00591357
[8]  
TROKEL MJ, 1994, SURG ENDOSC-ULTRAS, V8, P1385
[9]  
VAAGE J, 1985, CANCER RES, V45, P659