A Randomized, Controlled Investigation of Motor Cortex Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Effects on Quantitative Sensory Measures in Healthy Adults Evaluation of TMS Device Parameters

被引:30
作者
Borckardt, Jeffrey J. [1 ,2 ]
Reeves, Scott T. [2 ]
Beam, Will [2 ]
Jensen, Mark P. [5 ]
Gracely, Richard H. [6 ]
Katz, Sophie [1 ]
Smith, Arthur R. [2 ]
Madan, Alok [1 ]
Patterson, David [5 ]
George, Mark S. [1 ,3 ,4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ S Carolina, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Med Univ S Carolina, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[3] Med Univ S Carolina, Dept Neurol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[4] Med Univ S Carolina, Dept Radiol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, Ctr Neurosensory Disorders, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Ralph H Johnson VA Med Ctr, Charleston, SC USA
关键词
transcranial magnetic stimulation; pain; motor cortex; TMS; thermal; theta; CHRONIC NEUROPATHIC PAIN; THETA-BURST STIMULATION; BRAIN-STIMULATION; CORTICAL STIMULATION; RTMS; PERCEPTION; RELIEF; EXCITABILITY; THRESHOLDS; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/AJP.0b013e31820d2733
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives: There is emerging evidence that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can produce analgesic effects in clinical samples and in healthy adults undergoing experimentally induced pain; and the field of minimally invasive brain stimulation for the management of pain is expanding rapidly. Although motor cortex is the most widely used cortical target for TMS in the management of neuropathic pain, few studies have systematically investigated the analgesic effects of a full range of device parameters to provide initial hints about what stimulation intensities and frequencies are most helpful (or even potentially harmful) to patients. Further, there is considerable inconsistency between studies with respect to laboratory pain measurement procedures, TMS treatment parameters, sophistication of the sham methods, and sample sizes. Methods: This study used a sham-controlled, within-subject, crossover design to examine the effects of 5 different TMS treatment parameters across several quantitative sensory measures in a sample of healthy adult volunteers. Sixty-five participants underwent quantitative sensory testing procedures pre and post-40-minutes of real and sham motor cortex TMS. TMS was delivered at 1 Hz 80% resting motor threshold (rMT), 1 Hz 100% rMT, 10 Hz 80% rMT, 10 Hz 100% rMT, or 50 Hz triplets at 90% of active motor threshold (intermittent theta-burst). Results: The mean painfulness rating of real TMS stimulation itself was 3.0 (SE = 0.36) out of 10 and was significantly greater than zero [t(64) = 8.17, P < 0.0001]. The sham TMS methods used permitted matching between real and sham TMS-induced scalp sensations and participants were successfully blinded to condition (real versus sham). Findings suggest that the effects of motor cortex TMS on quantitative sensory tests in healthy adults vary across different treatment parameters with the smallest observed effect for intermittent theta-burst stimulation (Cohen's d = 0.03) and the largest for 10 Hz 100% rMT (d = 0.34). Discussion: Overall, TMS was associated with statistically significant effects on warm and cool sensory thresholds, cold pain thresholds, suprathreshold stimulus unpleasantness ratings, and wind-up pain. With respect to device parameter effects, higher frequency stimulation seems to be associated with the most analgesic and antisensitivity effects with the exception of intermittent theta-burst stimulation. The present findings support several clinical research findings suggesting that higher TMS frequencies tend to be associated with the most clinical benefit in patients with chronic pain.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 494
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
AMASSIAN VE, 1997, ELECTROENCEPHALOGR C, V103, P179
[2]   Pain relief by rTMS:: Differential effect of current flow but no specific action on pain subtypes [J].
Andre-Obadia, N. ;
Mertens, P. ;
Gueguen, A. ;
Peyron, R. ;
Garcia-Larrea, L. .
NEUROLOGY, 2008, 71 (11) :833-840
[3]   Transcranial magnetic stimulation for pain control.: Double-blind study of different frequencies against placebo, and correlation with motor cortex stimulation efficacy [J].
Andre-Obadia, Nathalie ;
Peyron, Roland ;
Mertens, Patrick ;
Mauguiere, Francois ;
Laurent, Bernard ;
Garcia-Larrea, Luis .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (07) :1536-1544
[4]  
Barker A.T., 1989, MAGNETIC STIMULATION, P55
[5]  
BARKER AT, 1985, LANCET, V1, P1106
[6]   Functional MRI of the immediate impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical and subcortical motor circuits [J].
Bestmann, S ;
Baudewig, J ;
Siebner, HR ;
Rothwell, JC ;
Frahm, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 19 (07) :1950-1962
[7]   Fifteen minutes of left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation acutely increases thermal pain thresholds in healthy adults [J].
Borckardt, Jeffrey J. ;
Smith, Arthur R. ;
Reeves, Scott T. ;
Weinstein, Mitchell ;
Kozel, F. Andrew ;
Nahas, Ziad ;
Shelley, Neal ;
Branham, R. Kyle ;
Thomas, K. Jackson ;
George, Mark S. .
PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2007, 12 (04) :287-290
[8]   Development and evaluation of a portable sham transcranial magnetic stimulation system [J].
Borckardt, Jeffrey J. ;
Walker, John ;
Branham, R. Kyle ;
Rydin-Gray, Sofia ;
Hunter, Caroline ;
Beeson, Heather ;
Reeves, Scott T. ;
Madan, Alok ;
Sackeim, Harold ;
George, Mark S. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2008, 1 (01) :52-59
[9]   Postoperative left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces patient-controlled analgesia use [J].
Borckardt, Jeffrey J. ;
Weinstein, Mitchel ;
Reeves, Scott T. ;
Kozel, F. Andrew ;
Nahas, Ziad ;
Smith, Arthur R. ;
Byrne, T. Karl ;
Morgan, Katherine ;
George, Mark S. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 105 (03) :557-562
[10]  
Borckardt Jeffrey J, 2009, J Pain Manag, V2, P295