Two-objective method for crisp and fuzzy interval comparison in optimization

被引:30
作者
Sevastjanov, P [1 ]
Róg, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Czestochowa Tech Univ, Inst Comp & Informat Sci, PL-42201 Czestochowa, Poland
关键词
crisp interval; fuzzy interval; interval comparison; probabilistic approach; optimization;
D O I
10.1016/j.cor.2004.07.002
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In real optimization we always meet two main groups of criteria: requirements of useful outcomes increasing or expenses decreasing and demands of lower uncertainty or, in other words, risk minimization. Therefore, it seems advisable to formulate optimization problem under conditions of uncertainty, at least, two-objective on the basis of local criteria of outcomes increasing or expenses reduction and risk minimization. Generally, risk may be treated as the uncertainty of obtained result. In the considered situation, the degree of risk (uncertainty) may be defined in a natural way through the width of final interval objective function at the point of optimum achieved. To solve the given problem, the two-objective interval comparison technique has been developed taking into account the probability of supremacy of one interval over the other one and relation of compared widths of intervals. To illustrate the efficiency of the proposed method, the simple examples of minimization of interval double-extreme discontinuous cost function and fuzzy extension of Rosenbrock's test function are presented. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 131
页数:17
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ANAL FUZZY INFORMATI
[2]   RATING AND RANKING OF MULTIPLE-ASPECT ALTERNATIVES USING FUZZY SETS [J].
BAAS, SM ;
KWAKERNAAK, H .
AUTOMATICA, 1977, 13 (01) :47-58
[3]  
BARTOLAN G, 1985, FUZZY SETS SYST, V15, P1
[4]  
Bayes T., 1763, Philosophical Transactions, V53, P370, DOI [10.1098/rstl.1763.0053, DOI 10.1098/RSTL.1763.0053]
[5]   Multiobjective programming in optimization of interval objective functions - A generalized approach [J].
Chanas, S ;
Kuchta, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 94 (03) :594-598
[6]   ASA and its application to multi-criteria decision making [J].
Choi, DY ;
Oh, KW .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) :89-102
[7]   Ranking fuzzy numbers using α-weighted valuations [J].
Detyniecki, M ;
Yager, RR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2000, 8 (05) :573-591
[8]   RANKING FUZZY NUMBERS IN THE SETTING OF POSSIBILITY THEORY [J].
DUBOIS, D ;
PRADE, H .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 1983, 30 (03) :183-224
[9]   SOCIAL CHOICE AXIOMS FOR FUZZY SET AGGREGATION [J].
DUBOIS, D ;
KONING, JL .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1991, 43 (03) :257-274
[10]  
Facchinetti G, 1998, INT J INTELL SYST, V13, P613, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-111X(199807)13:7<613::AID-INT2>3.0.CO