A review of recovery from sevoflurane anaesthesia: Comparisons with isoflurane and propofol including meta-analysis

被引:55
作者
Robinson, BJ
Uhrich, TD
Ebert, TJ
机构
[1] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Milwaukee, WI 53295 USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
anesthesia recovery period; anesthetics; intravenous; propofol; volatile; isoflurane; sevoflurane; statistics; meta analysis;
D O I
10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.430211.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Sevoflurane has a lower blood:gas partition coefficient than isoflurane and thus should be associated with a more rapid recovery from anaesthesia. Methods: A review and meta-analysis were employed to examine the recovery profiles of adult patients following anaesthesia, comparing sevoflurane to isoflurane and sevoflurane to propofol. Results: There were significant differences in times to several recovery events that favoured sevoflurane to isoflurane anaesthesia, including time to emergence, response to commands, extubation, and orientation. Likewise, there were significant differences in times to the same recovery events following anaesthesia with sevoflurane versus propofol. There were no differences in time to recovery room discharge when comparing sevoflurane to isoflurane or propofol. Conclusion: The observed differences between sevoflurane and isoflurane or propofol anaesthesia support the postulate that the use of sevoflurane is associated with a more rapid recovery from anaesthesia than either isoflurane or propofol.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 190
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   CLINICAL COMPARISON OF SEVOFLURANE AND ISOFLURANE WHEN ADMINISTERED WITH NITROUS-OXIDE FOR SURGICAL-PROCEDURES OF INTERMEDIATE DURATION [J].
CAMPBELL, C ;
NAHRWOLD, ML ;
MILLER, DD .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1995, 42 (10) :884-890
[2]   A phase III, multicenter, open label, randomized, comparative study evaluating the effect of sevoflurane versus isoflurane on the maintenance of anesthesia in adult ASA class I, II, and III inpatients [J].
Campbell, C ;
Andreen, M ;
Battito, MF ;
Camporesi, EM ;
Goldberg, ME ;
Grounds, RM ;
Hobbhahn, J ;
Lumb, P ;
Murray, JM ;
Solanki, DR ;
Heard, SO ;
Coriat, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1996, 8 (07) :557-563
[3]  
Cantillo J, 1997, PHARMACOTHERAPY, V17, P779
[4]   Meta-analysis: A method for synthesizing research [J].
DAgostino, RB ;
Weintraub, M .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1995, 58 (06) :605-616
[5]  
DESOUZA G, 1994, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V81, pA7
[6]  
DEXTER F, 1995, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V83, P77
[7]  
DOI M, 1993, CAN J ANAESTH, V40, P122, DOI 10.1007/BF03011308
[8]  
DUBIN SA, 1994, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V81, pA2
[9]   RECOVERY FROM SEVOFLURANE AND ISOFLURANE ANESTHESIA AFTER OUTPATIENT GYNECOLOGICAL LAPAROSCOPY [J].
ERIKSSON, H ;
HAASIO, J ;
KORTTILA, K .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 39 (03) :377-380
[10]   SEVOFLURANE FOR OUTPATIENT ANESTHESIA - A COMPARISON WITH PROPOFOL [J].
FREDMAN, B ;
NATHANSON, MH ;
SMITH, I ;
WANG, J ;
KLEIN, K ;
WHITE, PF .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (04) :823-828