Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

被引:211
作者
Lee, Myung Chul [1 ]
Seong, Sang Cheol [1 ]
Lee, Sahnghoon [1 ]
Chang, Chong Bum [1 ]
Park, Yoon Keun [1 ]
Jo, Hyunchul [1 ]
Kim, Choong Hyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seoul 110744, South Korea
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament; reconstruction; residual pivot shift; vertical orientation; subjective satisfaction;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2007.04.016
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This retrospective study was performed to relate tunnel position as measured by plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to residual pivot shift and to determine its clinical relevance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via central quadriceps tendon autograft. Methods: We reviewed 137 arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions via quadriceps tendon autograft with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Clinical results were evaluated by use of the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, Lysholm score, and Cybex dynamometer (Lumex, Ronkonkoma, NY). Anterior tibia] translation was measured with the KT-1000 arthrometer (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA). Patients were classified into 3 groups based on postoperative pivot-shift and Lachman test findings: group 1, both negative; group 11, negative Lachman test and positive pivot shift; and group IH, both positive. The radiographic analysis was performed via the angle between the tibia] and femoral tunnels on' plain anteroposterior radiographs, the angle between the tibial tunnel and anterior tibia] cortex on the lateral view, and the femoral and fibial tunnel location by use of the ratio method. Postoperative knee MRI was performed, and the angle between the intercondylar anteroposterior axis and femoral tunnel on the axial view and the angle between the joint line and the graft on the oblique coronal and sagittal views were measured. Results: There were 100 patients in group 1, 13 in group II, and 24 in group III. Patients in group I showed the greatest improvement in Lysholm score among the groups, and patients in group HI had the greatest side-to-side difference by KT-1000 arthrometer. Tunnel obliquity as measured by the angle between the anteroposterior axis of the femur and the femoral tunnel in the axial view on MRI was greater (P <.05) and the angle between the joint line and the graft on the oblique coronal view was less in group 1. Conclusions: This study showed a significantly lower Lysholm score and more vertical orientation of the femoral tunnel in the group with residual pivot shift than in the group without pivot shift. Vertical orientation of the femoral tunnel in the axial plane is closely related to residual pivot shift without definite anteroposterior laxity. More oblique positioning of the graft may have advantages in rotational stability, which in turn increase subjective patient satisfaction. Level of Evidence: Level 111, diagnostic study of nonconsecutive patients without consistently applied reference gold standard.
引用
收藏
页码:771 / 778
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]
Aglietti P, 1995, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, V3, P2, DOI 10.1007/BF01553517
[2]
BIOMECHANICS OF INTRAARTICULAR AND EXTRAARTICULAR RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT [J].
AMIS, AA ;
SCAMMELL, BE .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1993, 75 (05) :812-817
[3]
Intraoperative measurement of knee kinematics in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament [J].
Bull, AMJ ;
Earnshaw, PH ;
Smith, A ;
Katchburian, MV ;
Hassan, ANA ;
Amis, AA .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2002, 84B (07) :1075-1081
[4]
Carson EW, 1998, AAOS INSTR COURS LEC, V47, P361
[5]
Cole J, 2000, Am J Knee Surg, V13, P218
[6]
GALWAY HR, 1980, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P45
[7]
Getelman M H, 1999, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, V7, P189
[8]
FACTORS AFFECTING THE REGION OF MOST ISOMETRIC FEMORAL ATTACHMENTS .2. THE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT [J].
HEFZY, MS ;
GROOD, ES ;
NOYES, FR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1989, 17 (02) :208-216
[9]
Howell SM, 1999, ARTHROSCOPY, V15, P594
[10]
HOWELL SM, 1992, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P187