Interrelationships between 3-T-MRI-derived cortical and trabecular bone structure parameters and quantitative-computed-tomography-derived bone mineral density

被引:11
作者
Issever, Ahi Sema [1 ,2 ]
Link, Thomas M. [2 ]
Newitt, David [2 ]
Munoz, Thelma [2 ]
Majumdar, Sharmila [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Berlin, Charite Campus Mitte, Dept Radiol, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, Musculoskeletal & Quantitat Imaging Res Grp, San Francisco, CA 94107 USA
关键词
3-T MRI; Cortical bone; Trabecular bone; Osteoporosis; RESOLUTION MR-IMAGES; IN-VIVO; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; TESLA; QUALITY; OSTEOPOROSIS; DIAGNOSIS; STANDARD; BMD;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2010.06.003
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
Recently, 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been introduced for bone imaging. Through higher signal-to-noise ratios, as compared to 1.5-T MRI, it promises to be a more powerful tool for the assessment of cortical and trabecular bone measures. The goal of our study was to compare MRI-derived cortical and trabecular bone measures to quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-derived bone mineral density (BMD). Using 3-T MRI in 51 postmenopausal women, apparent (app.) measures of bone volume/total volume, trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) and trabecular separation were derived at the distal radius, distal tibia and calcaneus. Cortical thickness (Ct.Th) was calculated at the distal radius and distal tibia. These measures were compared to QCT-derived BMD of the spine, hip and radius. Significant correlations (*P<.05; **P<.001; ***P<.0001) were found between spine BMD- and MRI-derived Ct.Th r(radius)=.55, *P<.05; r(tibia)=.67, ***P<.0001) and app. Tb.N (r(radius)=.33, *P<.05; r(tibia)=.35, *P<.05) at the radius and tibia. Furthermore, within the first 10 mm at the radius, an inverse correlation for Ct.Th and app. BV/TV (r(6mm)=-.56, P<.001; r(10mm)=-.36, P<.05) and app. Tb.Th (r(6mm)=-.54, P<.001; r(10mm)=-.41, P<.05) was found. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1299 / 1305
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Bone strength and its determinants [J].
Ammann, P ;
Rizzoli, R .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 14 (Suppl 3) :S13-S18
[2]
[Anonymous], JAMA
[3]
PREDICTING FEMORAL-NECK STRENGTH FROM BONE-MINERAL DATA - A STRUCTURAL APPROACH [J].
BECK, TJ ;
RUFF, CB ;
WARDEN, KE ;
SCOTT, WW ;
RAO, GU .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1990, 25 (01) :6-18
[4]
Strength and size of bone in relation to calcium intake [J].
Bell, GH ;
Cuthbertson, DP ;
Orr, J .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1941, 100 (03) :299-317
[5]
Bone quality: where do we go from here? [J].
Bouxsein, ML .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 14 (Suppl 5) :S118-S127
[6]
[7]
Fyhrie D. P., 2005, Journal of Musculoskeletal & Neuronal Interactions, V5, P318
[8]
THE BONE-MINERAL CONTENT AND ULTIMATE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF LUMBAR VERTEBRAE [J].
HANSSON, T ;
ROOS, B ;
NACHEMSON, A .
SPINE, 1980, 5 (01) :46-55
[9]
Assessment of fracture risk [J].
Kanis, JA ;
Borgstrom, F ;
De Laet, C ;
Johansson, H ;
Johnell, O ;
Jonsson, B ;
Oden, A ;
Zethraeus, N ;
Pfleger, B ;
Khaltaev, N .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 16 (06) :581-589
[10]
In vivo determination of bone structure in postmenopausal women: a comparison of HR-pQCT and high-field MR imaging [J].
Kazakia, Galateia J. ;
Hyun, Benedict ;
Burghardt, Andrew J. ;
Krug, Roland ;
Newitt, David C. ;
de Papp, Anne E. ;
Link, Thomas M. ;
Majumdar, Sharmila .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2008, 23 (04) :463-474