Effects of electroacupuncture versus manual acupuncture on the human brain as measured by fMRI

被引:290
作者
Napadow, V
Makris, N
Liu, J
Kettner, NW
Kwong, KK
Hui, KKS
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Athinoula A Martinos Ctr Biomed Imaging, Charlestown, MA 02129 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Charlestown, MA USA
[3] Logan Coll Chiropract, Dept Radiol, Chesterfield, MO USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Neurol, Charlestown, MA 02129 USA
关键词
acupuncture methods; current frequencies; human brain mapping; limbic system; electro-acupuncture;
D O I
10.1002/hbm.20081
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The goal of this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study was to compare the central effects of electroacupuncture at different frequencies with traditional Chinese manual acupuncture. Although not as time-tested as manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture does have the advantage of setting stimulation frequency and intensity objectively and quantifiably. Manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture at 2 Hz and 100 Hz, and tactile control stimulation were carried out at acupoint ST-36. Overall, electroacupuncture (particularly at low frequency) produced more widespread fMRI signal increase than manual acupuncture did, and all acupuncture stimulations produced more widespread responses than did our placebo-like tactile control stimulation. Acupuncture produced hemodynamic signal increase in the anterior insula, and decrease in limbic and paralimbic structures including the amygdala, anterior hippocampus, and the cortices of the subgenual and retrosplenial cingulate, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, frontal, and temporal poles, results not seen for tactile control stimulation. Only electroacupuncture produced significant signal increase in the anterior middle cingulate cortex, whereas 2-Hz electroacupuncture produced signal increase in the pontine raphe area. All forms of stimulation (acupuncture and control) produced signal increase in SII. These findings support a hypothesis that the limbic system is central to acupuncture effect regardless of specific acupuncture modality, although some differences do exist in the underlying neurobiologic mechanisms for these modalities, and may aid in optimizing their future usage in clinical applications. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 205
页数:13
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Atlas of the human brainstem
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, NEUROANATOMY ATLAS S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Understanding acupuncture
[4]  
[Anonymous], NEUROPSYCHOLOGY EMOT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Fundamental Neuroscience
[6]   TIME COURSE EPI OF HUMAN BRAIN-FUNCTION DURING TASK ACTIVATION [J].
BANDETTINI, PA ;
WONG, EC ;
HINKS, RS ;
TIKOFSKY, RS ;
HYDE, JS .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1992, 25 (02) :390-397
[7]   Reward circuitry activation by noxious thermal stimuli [J].
Becerra, L ;
Breiter, HC ;
Wise, R ;
Gonzalez, RG ;
Borsook, D .
NEURON, 2001, 32 (05) :927-946
[8]   Acupuncture produces central activations in pain regions [J].
Biella, G ;
Sotgiu, ML ;
Pellegata, G ;
Paulesu, E ;
Castiglioni, I ;
Fazio, F .
NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 14 (01) :60-66
[9]   Subcortical structures involved in pain processing:: evidence from single-trial fMR1 [J].
Bingel, U ;
Quante, M ;
Knab, R ;
Bromm, B ;
Weiller, C ;
Büchel, C .
PAIN, 2002, 99 (1-2) :313-321
[10]   Painful stimuli evoke different stimulus-response functions in the amygdala, prefrontal, insula and somatosensory cortex:: a single-trial fMRI study [J].
Bornhövd, K ;
Quante, M ;
Glauche, V ;
Bromm, B ;
Weiller, C ;
Büchel, C .
BRAIN, 2002, 125 :1326-1336