Peripherally inserted central venous catheters for autologous blood progenitor cell transplantation in patients with haematological malignancies

被引:163
作者
Harter, C
Ostendorf, T
Bach, A
Egerer, G
Goldschmidt, H
Ho, AD
机构
[1] Univ Heidelberg, Med Klin & Poliklin 5, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Heidelberg, Univ Klin Anaesthesiol, D-6900 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
PICC; CVC; phlebitis; catheter-related infection; haematological malignancy;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-003-0517-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. In contrast to the high risk of haemorrhage associated with the implantation of a central venous catheter (CVC) via the internal jugular or subclavian access, the use of a peripherally inserted catheter (PICC) offers the advantage of a lower risk of bleeding complications. However, the rate of phlebitis is higher with the PICC and its use has been declining. We have studied the benefits and adverse events of a new type of PICC and a common type. Methods. From October 1999 to October 2001, 70 PICCs (Olimpicc, Vygon, Germany, n=40; and LIFECATH-PICC(PUR)5FR Vygon, Germany, n=30) were inserted into 66 patients with haematological malignancies and used for high-dose chemotherapy, total parenteral nutrition and autologous blood stem cell transplantation. While removing the catheter, central and peripheral blood cultures were taken. The catheter tip was investigated by the semi-quantitative roll-out method of Maki. Results. Sixty-five PICCs were removed after a median of 8.9 days. In five cases a catheter-associated significant colonisation with coagulase-negative staphylococci occurred. In two instances catheter-related bacteraemia was found. Conclusion. In our study this catheter system was inserted in 94% of patients without problems and showed a low incidence of phlebitis (5/65). Because of the high rate of catheter malfunction reported during and after our study, the Olimpicc catheter is no longer available. The PICC system, and the LIFECATH-PICC(PUR)5FR in particular, offers a safe and effective alternative for central venous access to the internal jugular vein.
引用
收藏
页码:790 / 794
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Venous thrombosis associated with the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters [J].
Allen, AW ;
Megargell, JL ;
Lynch, FC ;
Singh, H ;
Singh, Y ;
Waybill, PN .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 11 (10) :1309-1314
[2]   Central venous pressure measurements: Peripherally inserted catheters versus centrally inserted catheters [J].
Black, IH ;
Blosser, SA ;
Murray, WB .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (12) :3833-3836
[3]  
BLACK IH, 1999, NURS, V22, P36
[4]  
BOTTINO J, 1979, CANCER, V43, P1937, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197905)43:5<1937::AID-CNCR2820430554>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-T
[6]   Cumulative experience with 1,273 peripherally inserted central catheters at a single institution [J].
Cardella, JF ;
Cardella, K ;
Bacci, N ;
Fox, PS ;
Post, JH .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1996, 7 (01) :5-13
[7]  
DOLCOURT JL, 1982, PEDIATRICS, V70, P484
[8]   CENTRAL VS PERIPHERAL VENOUS CATHETERS IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS [J].
GIUFFRIDA, DJ ;
BRYANBROWN, CW ;
LUMB, PD ;
KWUN, KB ;
RHOADES, HM .
CHEST, 1986, 90 (06) :806-809
[9]   Venous thrombosis related to peripherally inserted central catheters [J].
Grove, JR ;
Pevec, WC .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 11 (07) :837-840
[10]  
Kyle K S, 1990, J Intraven Nurs, V13, P287