A spatial analysis of local climate change policy in the United States: Risk, stress, and opportunity

被引:83
作者
Brody, Samuel D. [1 ]
Zahran, Sammy [2 ]
Grover, Himanshu [1 ]
Vedlitz, Arnold [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture & Urban Planning, Hazard Reduct & Recovery Ctr, Environm Planning & Sustainabil Res Unit, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Sociol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, George Bush Sch Govt & Publ Serv, Inst Sci Technol & Publ Policy, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
climate change; spatial analysis; CCP; climate change risk; climate change stress;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.04.003
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This study examines the factors motivating local jurisdictions in the United States (U.S.) to voluntarily adopt policies that mitigate the anthropogenic sources of climate change when there are powerful political and economic incentives to do otherwise. Specifically, we explain adoption of the Cities for Climate Protection (CCP) program at the county level with indicators of climate change risk, climate stress, and opportunity for climate policy action. Statistical and spatial results indicate that counties with high risk, low stress, and high opportunity characteristics associated with climate change are significantly more likely to join the CCP campaign. Results also show that the odds of a locality joining the CCP are predictable by the landscape characteristics of spatial neighbors. Identifying a profile for likely adoption of climate change mitigation strategies can help decision makers effectively target local jurisdictions for recruitment into the CCP and similar programs in the future. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 41
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] LOCAL INDICATORS OF SPATIAL ASSOCIATION - LISA
    ANSELIN, L
    [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS, 1995, 27 (02) : 93 - 115
  • [2] Climate change effects on vegetation distribution and carbon budget in the United States
    Bachelet, D
    Neilson, RP
    Lenihan, JM
    Drapek, RJ
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS, 2001, 4 (03) : 164 - 185
  • [3] BETSILL M, 2000, CONTROLLING GREENHOU
  • [4] Betsill MicheleM., 2001, LOCAL ENVIRON, V6, P393, DOI DOI 10.1080/13549830120091699
  • [5] Think globally, act locally? Local climate change and energy policies in Sweden and the UK
    Collier, U
    Lofstedt, RE
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 1997, 7 (01): : 25 - 40
  • [6] Carbon emissions - The economic benefits of the Kyoto Protocol
    De Leo, GA
    Rizzi, L
    Caizzi, A
    Gatto, M
    [J]. NATURE, 2001, 413 (6855) : 478 - 479
  • [7] The struggle to govern the commons
    Dietz, T
    Ostrom, E
    Stern, PC
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2003, 302 (5652) : 1907 - 1912
  • [8] EDMONDS JA, 2003, GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANG
  • [9] HARDIN G, 1968, SCIENCE, V162, P1248
  • [10] DETERMINANTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION WITH REGARD TO CLIMATIC-CHANGE
    JAEGER, C
    DURRENBERGER, G
    KASTENHOLZ, H
    TRUFFER, B
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 1993, 23 (03) : 193 - 211