Predators increase the risk of catastrophic extinction of prey populations

被引:77
作者
Schoener, TW [1 ]
Spiller, DA
Losos, JB
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Sect Ecol & Evolut, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Biol, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/35084071
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
There has been considerable research on both top-down effects(1,2) and on disturbances(3-5) in ecological communities; however, the interaction between the two, when the disturbance is catastrophic, has rarely been examined(6). Predators may increase the probability of prey extinction resulting from a catastrophic disturbance both by reducing prey population size(7,8) and by changing ecological traits of prey individuals such as habitat characteristics(8,9) in a way that increases the vulnerability of prey species to extinction. We show that a major hurricane in the Bahamas led to the extinction of lizard populations on most islands onto which a predator had been experimentally introduced, whereas no populations became extinct on control islands. Before the hurricane, the predator had reduced prey populations to about half of those on control islands. Two months after the hurricane, we found only recently hatched individuals-apparently lizards survived the inundating storm surge only as eggs. On predator-introduction islands, those hatchling populations were a smaller fraction of pre-hurricane populations than on control islands. Egg survival allowed rapid recovery of prey populations to pre-hurricane levels on all control islands but on only a third of predator-introduction islands-the other two-thirds lost their prey populations. Thus climatic disturbance compounded by predation brought prey populations to extinction.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 186
页数:4
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Limits to the similarity of competitors under hierarchical lottery competition [J].
Abrams, PA .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1996, 148 (01) :211-219
[2]  
Ackerman J., 2000, NAT GEOGR MAG OCT, V198, P86
[3]  
Andrewartha HG., 1954, DISTRIBUTION ABUNDAN
[4]  
Diamond J, 1986, COMMUNITY ECOLOGY
[5]  
DUNSON WA, 1991, AM NAT, V101, P97
[6]  
EVANS EW, 1982, J NEW YORK ENTOMOL S, V90, P241
[7]  
FIENBERG SE, 1972, BIOMETRIKA, V59, P591, DOI 10.2307/2334810
[8]   Evidence for asymmetrical intraguild predation between native and introduced Anolis lizards [J].
Gerber, GP ;
Echternacht, AC .
OECOLOGIA, 2000, 124 (04) :599-607
[9]   TECHNIQUE FOR ESTIMATING THE SIZE OF LIZARD POPULATIONS [J].
HECKEL, DG ;
ROUGHGARDEN, J .
ECOLOGY, 1979, 60 (05) :966-975
[10]   THE ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF SHARED NATURAL ENEMIES [J].
HOLT, RD ;
LAWTON, JH .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1994, 25 :495-520