Neuroanatomical differences between mouse strains as shown by high-resolution 3D MRI

被引:103
作者
Chen, XJ
Kovacevic, N
Lobaugh, NJ
Sled, JG
Henkelman, RM
Henderson, JT
机构
[1] Hosp Sick Children, Mouse Imaging Ctr, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook & Womens Coll Hlth Sci Ctr, Imaging Res Cognit Neurol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Leslie Dan Fac Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大创新基金会; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.008
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The search for new mouse models of human disease requires a sensitive metric to make three-dimensional (3D) anatomical comparisons in a rapid and quantifiable manner. This is especially true in the brain, where changes in complex shapes such as the hippocampus and ventricles are difficult to assess with 2D histology. Here, we report that the 3D neuroanatomy of three strains of mice (129S1/ SvImJ, C57/B16, and CD1) is significantly different from one another. Using image co-registration, we `morphed' together nine brains of each strain scanned by magnetic resonance imaging at (60 mu m)(3) resolution to synthesize an average image. We applied three methods of comparison. First, we used visual inspection and graphically examined the standard deviation of the variability in each strain. Second, we annotated 42 neural structures and compared their volumes across the strains. Third, we assessed significant local deviations in volume and displacement between the two inbred strains, independent of prior anatomical knowledge. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 105
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis [J].
Bookstein, FL .
BULLETIN OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY, 1996, 58 (02) :313-365
[2]   A unified statistical approach to deformation-based morphometry [J].
Chung, MK ;
Worsley, KJ ;
Paus, T ;
Cherif, C ;
Collins, DL ;
Giedd, JN ;
Rapoport, JL ;
Evanst, AC .
NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 14 (03) :595-606
[3]   Hormonal Management of Prostate Cancer: Current Status and Future Developments - June 2003, Los Angeles, CA, USA - Introduction [J].
Crawford, ED ;
Bono, AV .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2004, 3 (01) :1-1
[4]   DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A HIGH HOMOGENEITY RF COIL FOR SOLID-STATE MULTIPLE-PULSE NMR [J].
IDZIAK, S ;
HAEBERLEN, U .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1982, 50 (02) :281-288
[5]   A three-dimensional MRI atlas of the mouse brain with estimates of the average and variability [J].
Kovacevic, N ;
Henderson, JT ;
Chan, E ;
Lifshitz, N ;
Bishop, J ;
Evans, AC ;
Henkelman, RM ;
Chen, XJ .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2005, 15 (05) :639-645
[6]  
Kovacevic N, 2004, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3216, P615
[7]   Asymmetry of the brain surface from deformation field analysis [J].
Lancaster, JL ;
Kochunov, PV ;
Thompson, PM ;
Toga, AW ;
Fox, PT .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2003, 19 (02) :79-89
[8]   Partial least squares analysis of neuroimaging data: applications and advances [J].
McIntosh, AR ;
Lobaugh, NJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2004, 23 :S250-S263
[9]   Multiresolution segmentation of natural images: From linear to nonlinear scale-space representations [J].
Petrovic, A ;
Escoda, OD ;
Vandergheynst, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2004, 13 (08) :1104-1114
[10]   Tuning and comparing spatial normalization methods [J].
Robbins, S ;
Evans, AC ;
Collins, DL ;
Whitesides, S .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2004, 8 (03) :311-323