Are gifts from pharmaceutical companies ethically problematic? A survey of physicians

被引:86
作者
Brett, AS [1 ]
Burr, W [1 ]
Moloo, MA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Med, Columbia, SC 29203 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.163.18.2213
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Personalized pharmaceutical marketing to physicians, including the provision of gifts and sponsorship of educational and recreational activities, raises ethical issues. We sought to determine the degree to which physicians regarded common pharmaceutical marketing activities as ethically problematic, and to compare the views of experienced physicians and physicians-in-training. Methods: A questionnaire that included 18 scenarios portraying interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry was distributed to residents and faculty members at a US medical school. Results: Most marketing activities were not thought to pose major ethical problems. Respondents tended to make distinctions about the ethical appropriateness of gifts on the basis of the monetary value and type of gift. Some respondents' views would be in violation of recent professional guidelines that address interactions between physicians and pharmaceutical companies. However, some respondents were troubled by activities that are permitted by professional guidelines. The responses of residents and faculty physicians were similar. Conclusions: Despite the recent publicity about ethical problems in relationships between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry, inexperienced and experienced physicians at a single institution continue to have a rather permissive view about a variety of marketing activities.
引用
收藏
页码:2213 / 2218
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   ATTITUDES OF MEDICAL-SCHOOL FACULTY TOWARD GIFTS FROM THE PHARMACEUTICAL-INDUSTRY [J].
BANKS, JW ;
MAINOUS, AG .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1992, 67 (09) :610-612
[2]   THE EFFECT ON RESIDENT ATTITUDES OF REGULATORY POLICIES REGARDING PHARMACEUTICAL REPRESENTATIVE ACTIVITIES [J].
BROTZMAN, GL ;
MARK, DH .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 8 (03) :130-134
[3]   DOCTORS, DRUG COMPANIES, AND GIFTS [J].
CHREN, MM ;
LANDEFELD, CS ;
MURRAY, TH .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 262 (24) :3448-3451
[4]  
*COUNC ETH JUD AFF, E ADD 2 COUNC ETH JU
[5]   Physician-industry relations. Part 1: Individual physicians [J].
Coyle, SL .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 136 (05) :396-402
[6]   A comparison of physicians' and patients' attitudes toward pharmaceutical industry gifts [J].
Gibbons, RV ;
Landry, FJ ;
Blouch, DL ;
Jones, DL ;
Williams, FK ;
Lucey, CR ;
Kroenke, K .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 13 (03) :151-154
[7]  
GOODMAN B, 1999, SOC GEN INTER MED FO, V22, P18
[8]  
GOODMAN B, 1999, SOC GEN INTER MED FO, V22, P10
[9]   IMPACT OF PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY REPRESENTATIVES ON INTERNAL-MEDICINE RESIDENCY PROGRAMS - A SURVEY OF RESIDENCY PROGRAM DIRECTORS [J].
LICHSTEIN, PR ;
TURNER, RC ;
OBRIEN, K .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 152 (05) :1009-1013
[10]  
MARGOLIS LH, 1991, PEDIATRICS, V88, P1233