The strategic landscape investment model: a tool for mapping optimal environmental expenditure

被引:35
作者
Hajkowicz, S
Perraud, JM
Dawes, W
DeRose, R
机构
[1] CSIRO, Sustainable Ecosyst, Brisbane, Qld 4067, Australia
[2] CSIRO, Land & Water, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
landscape optimisation; investment analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.08.009
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper presents the strategic landscape investment model (SLIM). This tool can be used to map optimal landscape treatment patterns at regional scales. Developed for New, South Wales (NSW) in Australia, SLIM aims to maximise an indexed measure of environmental benefit within a budget constraint. The attributes considered include salinity, water yield, nitrogen run-off, phosphorus run-off, stream sediment concentrations. soil erosion and carbon sequestration. The modelling is undertaken spatially with a roughly 1 km(2) grid covering NSW. With estimates of costs and benefits, maps of marginal environmental benefit per dollar expended can be constructed. These maps are used to define an optimal treatment pattern within the confines of a program budget. SLIM is demonstrated through an analysis of perennial pasture establishment on NSW grazing lands. It was found that the optimal treatment area is around 4% of the total treatable area, demonstrating the importance of careful investment targeting. Through sensitivity analysis it is found that the location of optimal landscape treatment patterns is relatively robust under numerous attribute weighting scenarios. The paper explores the strengths and weaknesses of SLIM considering how, improved analytic capabilities could be added to future revisions. Crown Copyright (c) 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1251 / 1262
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
BABCOCK BA, 1995, 95WP IOW STAT U CTR
[2]   Economics of deep-rooted perennials in western Australia [J].
Bathgate, A ;
Pannell, DJ .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2002, 53 (1-3) :117-132
[3]   Computational aspects of hard Knapsack Problems [J].
Caccetta, L ;
Kulanoot, A .
NONLINEAR ANALYSIS-THEORY METHODS & APPLICATIONS, 2001, 47 (08) :5547-5558
[4]  
Cooksey R. W., 1996, Judgement analysis, theory, methods and applications
[5]  
CORAM JE, 2000, AUSTR GROUNDW FLOW S
[6]  
Crowley Kate., 2001, J ENV POLICY PLANNIN, V3, P255, DOI DOI 10.1002/JEPP.95
[7]   Measuring the productivity of threatened-species programs [J].
Cullen, R ;
Fairburn, GA ;
Hughey, KFD .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 39 (01) :53-66
[8]  
DEAR B, 2003, SUBTERRANEAN CLOVER
[9]  
Drummond M., 2015, METHODS EC EVALUATIO, V4
[10]  
*EC, 2002, GEN REP