Open Innovation: Past Research, Current Debates, and Future Directions

被引:739
作者
Lichtenthaler, Ulrich [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mannheim, D-6800 Mannheim 1, Germany
关键词
COMMUNICATION BARRIER; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE; TECHNOLOGY; FIELD; PERFORMANCE; CAPABILITIES; PERSPECTIVE; MODEL; USERS;
D O I
10.5465/AMP.2011.59198451
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
020101 [政治经济学];
摘要
The concept of open innovation has recently gained widespread attention. It is particularly relevant now because many firms are required to implement open innovation, despite the difficulties associated with managing these activities. After providing a definition of open innovation delimiting it from open source, an overview of prior research is given, which identifies the following important topics of earlier open innovation research: technology transactions, user innovation, business models, and innovation markets. In light of current controversial debates about the value of the open innovation framework, we evaluate the literature and assess whether open innovation is a sustainable trend rather than a management fashion. On this basis, we present a conceptual framework that provides the foundation for discussing critical open innovation processes and their implications for managing open innovation at the organizational, project, and individual level. Thus, we assess the multilevel determinants of the make-or-buy, integrate-or-relate, and keep-or-sell decisions in opening up the innovation process. Then, we propose a research agenda based on this conceptual framework with particular emphasis on the organizational antecedents and performance consequences of open innovation and on important research design issues. Finally, we discuss implications for management education and practice, and we provide a conclusion and outlook.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 93
页数:19
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]
Management fashion [J].
Abrahamson, E .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1996, 21 (01) :254-285
[3]
Innovation and Growth: How Business Contributes to Society [J].
Ahlstrom, David .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2010, 24 (03) :11-24
[4]
Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[5]
Alexy O, 2009, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V51, P71
[6]
OPEN VERSUS CLOSED INNOVATION: A MODEL OF DISCOVERY AND DIVERGENCE [J].
Almirall, Esteve ;
Casadesus-Masanell, Ramon .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2010, 35 (01) :27-47
[7]
[Anonymous], INT J TECHN IN PRESS
[8]
[Anonymous], LEARNING FIRMS ORG N
[9]
[Anonymous], REMBRANDS ATTIC UNLO
[10]
[Anonymous], 2006, OPEN INNOVATION RES