Cross-modal feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory

被引:38
作者
Jones, TC
Jacoby, LL
Gellis, LA
机构
[1] Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Psychol, Wellington, New Zealand
[2] NYU, New York, NY USA
[3] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Univ Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
recognition memory; false recognition; feature errors; conjunction errors; modality effect; recollection; familiarity; dual-process theory;
D O I
10.1006/jmla.2001.2713
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Four experiments were conducted to investigate whether a modality-specific familiarity contributes to feature and conjunction errors and, hence, to recognition memory. In each experiment, the presentation modality of compound welds was manipulated at study (auditory or visual), and in Experiment 2 the presentation modality for the test also was manipulated. In Experiment 3. participants were pushed to respond quickly in order to create a reliance on familiarity rather than recollection. In Experiment 4, a direct manipulation of response deadline was employed. Across experiments, auditory and visual tests did not produce different hit tares or feature and conjunction error rates, and shifts in study-to-test modality did not affect hit rates or feature and conjunction error rates. The response deadline manipulation of Experiment 4 affected old/new discrimination but not feature and conjunction effects (feature/new and conjunction/new discrimination), producing a dissociation. Unlike implicit perceptual memory, modality information does not appear to contribute significantly to the familiarity underlying feature and conjunction errors. The familiarity underlying feature and conjunction errors, and thus in recognition memory, is different from the familiarity underlying perceptual implicit memory. (C) 2001 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 152
页数:22
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Atkinson R.C., 1974, Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology: I. Learning, P243
[2]  
BARTLETT JC, 1998, 39 ANN M PSYCH SOC D
[3]   INVESTIGATING DISSOCIATIONS AMONG MEMORY MEASURES - SUPPORT FOR A TRANSFER-APPROPRIATE PROCESSING FRAMEWORK [J].
BLAXTON, TA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1989, 15 (04) :657-668
[4]   CONTEXT AND REPETITION EFFECTS IN LEXICAL DECISION AND RECOGNITION MEMORY [J].
CARROLL, M ;
KIRSNER, K .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1982, 21 (01) :55-69
[5]  
Challis B H, 1993, Memory, V1, P127, DOI 10.1080/09658219308258228
[6]   ON THE PREDICTION OF OCCURRENCE OF PARTICULAR VERBAL INTRUSIONS IN IMMEDIATE RECALL [J].
DEESE, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1959, 58 (01) :17-22
[8]   DOUBLE DISSOCIATION BETWEEN MEMORY-SYSTEMS UNDERLYING EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT MEMORY IN THE HUMAN BRAIN [J].
GABRIELI, JDE ;
FLEISCHMAN, DA ;
KEANE, MM ;
REMINGER, SL ;
MORRELL, F .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1995, 6 (02) :76-82
[9]   RECOLLECTIVE EXPERIENCE IN WORD AND NONWORD RECOGNITION [J].
GARDINER, JM ;
JAVA, RI .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1990, 18 (01) :23-30
[10]   ATTENTION AND RECOLLECTIVE EXPERIENCE IN RECOGNITION MEMORY [J].
GARDINER, JM ;
PARKIN, AJ .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1990, 18 (06) :579-583