Propensity score matching - An illustrative analysis of dose response

被引:105
作者
Foster, EM [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Hlth Policy & Adm, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
econometrics; mental health; children's health; propensity score; dose; dose response; mental health services;
D O I
10.1097/01.MLR.0000089629.62884.22
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND. Health services researchers are often interested in the effect of a treatment or a service in situations in which randomization is difficult or impossible. One useful alternative involves propensity score methods, a means for matching members of different groups based on a range of characteristics. Under certain assumptions, comparisons of the matched groups reveal the impact of the treatment of interest. OBJECTIVES. This article reviews propensity score methods and illustrates their use in an analysis of dose response, the relationship between the volume of services receive, an treatment outcomes. In mental health policy, this question is central to key issues such as parity. RESEARCH DESIGN. Data for the illustrative analysis are taken from a well-known study of children's mental health services. This analysis estimates the impact of outpatient therapy based on comparisons of individuals receiving different treatment doses. Those comparisons are adjusted for preexisting observed differences among the groups using propensity score methods. SUBJECTS. The study includes 301 participants aged 5 to 18 years treated at the study sites. MEASURES. The analyses are based on family characteristics and the mental health status of children and adolescents reported in interviews with parents as well as administrative data on service use. RESULTS. Analyses using propensity score matching suggest that added services improve treatment outcomes, especially child functioning. However, at least for the services and outcomes considered, the marginal benefits to high levels of treatment are limited. CONCLUSIONS. These analyses illustrate the potential value of propensity score methods to health services researchers.
引用
收藏
页码:1183 / 1192
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] ACHENBACH TM, 1991, MAMUAL CHILD BEHAV C
  • [2] Dose effect in child psychotherapy: Outcomes associated with negligible treatment
    Andrade, AR
    Lambert, EW
    Bickman, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 39 (02) : 161 - 168
  • [3] Effectiveness of nonresidential specialty mental health services for children and adolescents in the "real world"
    Angold, A
    Costello, EJ
    Burns, BJ
    Erkanli, A
    Farmer, EMZ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 39 (02) : 154 - 160
  • [4] ANGRIST J, 1999, 241 NBER
  • [5] Bickman Leonard, 2002, Ment Health Serv Res, V4, P57, DOI 10.1023/A:1015210332175
  • [6] Davidson R., 1993, ESTIMATION INFERENCE, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0266466600009452
  • [7] DEHEJIA RH, 1998, PROPENSITY SCOURCE M
  • [8] The costs of mental health services under the Fort Bragg Demonstration
    Foster, EM
    Summerfelt, WT
    Saunders, RC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, 1996, 23 (01): : 92 - 106
  • [9] Foster EM, 2000, HEALTH SERV RES, V35, P1135
  • [10] An illustration of the use of instrumental variables: Do neighborhood conditions affect a young person's chance of finishing high school?
    Foster, EM
    McLanahan, S
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1996, 1 (03) : 249 - 260