A fractally coated, 1.3 mm2 high impedance pacing electrode

被引:16
作者
Fröhlig, G [1 ]
Bolz, A
Ströbel, J
Rutz, M
Lawall, P
Schwerdt, H
Schaldach, M
Schieffer, H
机构
[1] Univ Homburg, Med Klin, D-66421 Homburg, Germany
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Inst Biomed Tech, Nurnberg, Germany
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 1998年 / 21卷 / 06期
关键词
small surface; high impedance; fractal coating; pacing electrode;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00183.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Minimizing the geometric surface area of pacing electrodes increases impedance and reduces the current drain during stimulation, provided that voltage (pulse-width) thresholds remain unchanged. This may be feasible by coating the electrode surface to increase the capacity of the electrode tissue interface and to diminish polarization. Ten unipolar, tined leads with a surface area of 1.3 mm(2) and a "fractal" coating of lridium (Biotronik SD-V137) were implanted in the ventricle, and electrogram amplitude (unfiltered), slew-rate pacing threshold (0.5 ms), and impedance (2.5 V; 0.5 ms) were measured by the 5311 PSA (Medtronic). On days 0, 2, 5, 10, 28, 90, 180, 360 postimplant, sensing threshold (up to 7.0 mV, measuring range 1-14 mV on day 360 only) and the strength duration curve (0.5-4.0 V; 0.03-1.5ms; steps: 0.5 V; 0.01 ms, respectively) were determined, the minimum charge delivered per pulse (charge threshold), and the impedance were taken from pacemaker telemetry (Intermedics 294-03). Data were compared with those of an earlier series of 20 unipolar, tined TIR-leads (Biotronik) with a surface area of 10 mm(2) and a "fractal" coating of titanium nitride. With the model SD-V137 versus TIR, intraoperative electrogram amplitudes were 15.1 +/- 6.1 versus 14.4 +/- 3.9 mV CNS), slew rates 3.45 +/- 1.57 versus 1.94 +/- 1.06 V/s (P < 0.05), pacing thresholds 0.16 +/- 0.05 versus 0.52 +/- 0.15 V (P < 0.01) and impedance measurements 1,136 +/- 175 versus 441 +/- 73 Omega (P < 0.0001), respectively. During follow-up, sensing thresholds were the same with both leads. Differences in pulse width thresholds lost its significance on day 28 but resumed on defy 360 (SD-V137: 0.08 +/- 0.04 ms; TIR: 0.16 +/- 0.06 ms at 2.5 V; P < 0.02). With an electrode surface of 1.3 mm(2), charge per pulse and impedance consistently differed from control, being 0.15 +/- 0.15 versus 0.66 +/- 0.20 mu C(P < 0.001) and 1,344 +/- 376 versus 538 +/- 79 Omega, respectively, one year after implantation (P < 0.0001). In summary, "fractally" coated small surface electrodes do not compromise sensing; by more than doubling impedance against controls they offer pacing thresholds (mainly in terms of charge) that are significantly lower than with the reference electrode.
引用
收藏
页码:1239 / 1246
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] ASTRINSKY EA, 1983, CLIN PROG PACING ELE, V1, P51
  • [2] BOLZ A, 1995, BEDEUTUNG PHASENGREN
  • [3] TOWARD OPTIMIZING THE DETECTION OF ATRIAL DEPOLARIZATION WITH FLOATING BIPOLAR ELECTRODES
    BROWNLEE, RR
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 12 (03): : 431 - 442
  • [4] STIFFNESS OF THE DISTAL TIP OF BIPOLAR PACING LEADS
    CAMERON, J
    MOND, H
    CIDDOR, G
    HARPER, K
    MCKIE, J
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 13 (12): : 1915 - 1920
  • [5] CHAMPAGNE J, 1996, PACE, V19, P740
  • [6] DANILOVIC D, 1996, EUR JCPE S5, V6, P221
  • [7] DANILOVIC D, 1995, PACE, V18, P1790
  • [8] DANILOVIC D, 1995, PACE, V18, P1185
  • [9] Initial experience with 1.5-mm(2) high impedance, steroid-eluting pacing electrodes
    Fogel, R
    Pirzada, F
    Casavant, D
    Boone, J
    Bowman, A
    Steinhaus, D
    Gilbert, M
    Vlietstra, R
    Belott, P
    Parsonnet, V
    Tilton, G
    White, M
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 19 (02): : 188 - 196
  • [10] DECREASING ELECTRODE SIZE AND INCREASING EFFICIENCY OF CARDIAC STIMULATION
    FURMAN, S
    PARKER, B
    ESCHER, DJW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 1971, 11 (03) : 105 - &