FDG-PET for detection of pulmonary metastases from malignant primary bone tumors:: Comparison with spiral CT

被引:138
作者
Franzius, C
Daldrup-Link, HE
Sciuk, J
Rummeny, EJ
Bielack, S
Jürgens, H
Schober, O
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Radiol, Munster, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp, Dept Pediat Hematol & Oncol, Munster, Germany
关键词
Ewing's sarcoma; FDG-PET; malignant primary bone tumors; osteosarcoma; pulmonary metastases; thoracic CT;
D O I
10.1023/A:1011111322376
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose was the comparison of positron emission tomography using F-18-fluorodeoxy-glucose (FDG-PET) and spiral thoracic CT to detect pulmonary metastases from malignant primary osseous tumors. Patients and methods: In 71 patients with histologically confirmed malignant primary bone tumors (32 osteosarcomas, 39 Ewing's sarcomas) 111 FDG-PET examinations were evaluated with regard to pulmonary/pleural metastases in comparison with spiral thoracic CT. Reference methods were the clinical follow-ups for 6-64 months (median 20 months) or a histopathologic analysis. Results: In 16 patients (23%) reference methods revealed a pulmonary/pleural metastatic disease. FDG-PET had a sensitivity of 0.50, a specificity of 0.98, and an accuracy of 0.87 on a patient based analysis. Comparable values for spiral CT were 0.75, 1.00, and 0.94. It was shown that no patient who had a true positive FDG-PET had a false negative CT scan, nor was a pulmonary metastases detected earlier by FDG-PET than by spiral CT. Conclusions: There seems to be a superiority of spiral CT in the detection of pulmonary metastases from malignant primary bone tumors as compared with FDG-PET. Therefore, at present a negative FDG-PET cannot be recommended to exclude lung metastases. However, as specificity of FDG-PET is high, a positive FDG-PET result can be used to confirm abnormalities seen on thoracic CT scans as metastatic.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 486
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Bedigian MP, 1998, EUR J NUCL MED, V25, P659
[2]  
Bengel FM, 1997, EUR J NUCL MED, V24, P1091
[3]   THE SCINTIGRAPHIC DETECTION OF OSSIFIC MEDIASTINAL AND PULMONARY METASTASES IN OSTEOSARCOMA [J].
BRADY, AP ;
ENNIS, JT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1990, 63 (756) :978-980
[4]   On the current management of osteosarcoma. A critical evaluation and a proposal for a modified treatment strategy [J].
Bruland, OS ;
Pihl, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 (11) :1725-1731
[5]   Evaluation of chemotherapy response in primary bone tumors with F-18FDG positron emission tomography compared with histologically assessed tumor necrosis [J].
Franzius, C ;
Sciuk, J ;
Brinkschmidt, C ;
Jürgens, H ;
Schober, O .
CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2000, 25 (11) :874-881
[6]   FDG-PET for detection of osseous metastases from malignant primary bone tumours:: comparison with bone scintigraphy [J].
Franzius, C ;
Sciuk, J ;
Daldrup-Link, HE ;
Jürgens, H ;
Schober, O .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2000, 27 (09) :1305-1311
[7]  
Gupta NC, 1996, J NUCL MED, V37, P943
[8]  
HOFFMAN EJ, 1979, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V3, P229
[9]  
Huvos AG, 1991, BONE TUMORS DIAGNOSI
[10]  
JURGENS H, 1988, J CLIN ONCOL, V88, P484