Methods of ensuring high follow-up rates: Lessons from a longitudinal study of dual diagnosed participants

被引:44
作者
BootsMiller, BJ
Ribisl, KM
Mowbray, CT
Davidson, WS
Walton, MA
Herman, SE
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Substance Abuse Res Ctr, Serious Mental Illness Treatment Res & Evaluat Ct, Vet Adm Med Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI 48133 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford Ctr Res Dis Prevent, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Social Work, Stanford Ctr Res Dis Prevent, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Sch Social Work, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Michigan State Univ, Dept Psychol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Alcohol Res Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
retention; attrition; follow-up; longitudinal studies;
D O I
10.3109/10826089809059344
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite growing research interest in co-occurring psychiatric and substance misuse disorders, relatively few longitudinal studies have been conducted with dual diagnosis populations. Many of the longitudinal studies that have been done have experienced excessive attrition. Thus, investigators have noted that one of the primary difficulties of conducting longitudinal studies with this population is successfully minimizing attrition during follow-up. This study, conducted in 1991-1993, describes retention and tracking methods employed in a longitudinal study of 485 dual diagnosis participants. Follow-up interview completion rates at the 2-, 6-, 10-, 14-, and 18-month interviews were 86.7, 85.6, 85.1, 84.5, and 88.4%, respectively. Several case studies are provided that document some of the challenges facing project staff and successful strategies for handling them. A notable finding from this study was that participants reported that the relationship established with the interviewer was more important than material incentives in preventing study attrition.
引用
收藏
页码:2665 / 2685
页数:21
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Intensive follow-up of control subjects: Is it necessary? [J].
Alderman, BW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1996, 86 (05) :744-745
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, DOI [10.1177/0021886396323002, DOI 10.1177/0021886396323002]
[3]  
[Anonymous], ALTERNATIVE TREATMEN
[4]  
[Anonymous], TRACKING RESPONDENTS
[5]   FOLLOW-UP DIFFICULTY WITH SUBSTANCE ABUSERS - PREDICTORS OF TIME TO LOCATE AND RELATIONSHIP TO OUTCOME [J].
BALE, RN ;
ARNOLDUSSEN, BH ;
QUITTNER, AM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ADDICTIONS, 1984, 19 (08) :885-902
[6]   FOLLOW-UP EVALUATION OF DRUG-ABUSE TREATMENT [J].
BALE, RN ;
CABRERA, S ;
BROWN, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE, 1977, 4 (02) :233-249
[7]  
BARTELS SJ, 1995, PSYCHIAT SERV, V46, P248
[8]  
Bond G.R., 1991, Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, V15, P31, DOI DOI 10.1037/H0095785
[9]   THE DUAL CRISIS - MENTAL-ILLNESS AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE - PRESENT AND FUTURE-DIRECTIONS [J].
BROWN, VB ;
RIDGELY, MS ;
PEPPER, B ;
LEVINE, IS ;
RYGLEWICZ, H .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1989, 44 (03) :565-569
[10]  
COEN EH, 1996, EVAL PROGRAM PLANN, V19, P309