Selecting forest reserves with a multiobjective spatial algorithm

被引:19
作者
Siitonen, P
Tanskanen, A
Lehtinen, A
机构
[1] Finnish Environm Inst, Dept Res, Res Programme Biodivers, Helsinki 00251, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Math, Helsinki 00014, Finland
[3] Helsinki Sch Econ, FIN-00101 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
reserve selection; spatial objectives; optimization; habitat fragmentation; forest planning;
D O I
10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00039-X
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We applied a multiobjective spatial heuristic algorithm in a landscape area of 10 000 ha in eastern Finland, to select forest stands that would best complement the existing reserves in terms of achievement of conservation objectives while minimizing costs. Several non-spatial and spatial objectives for quality, area, and spatial distribution of forests were defined in cooperation with forest managers. Furthermore, existing reserves were pre-selected. The cost of each stand was calculated on the basis of the economic value of forest land and timber. The algorithm calculated cost-benefit ratios for the stands on the basis of how well each stand fulfilled the non-spatial and spatial objectives and at what cost. In every cycle, the algorithm selected the stand with the best cost-benefit ratio. A comparison between solutions, one without and three with differently weighted spatial objectives, showed that the network of selected stands was more clustered with than without spatial objectives. The use of the spatial objectives increased costs and the area slightly, and the non-spatial objectives were met almost equally in all solutions. The network of selected stands in one 2 100 ha sub-region was more clustered when stands were selected from the whole region rather than only from that sub-region. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 309
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Umbrellas and flagships: Efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? [J].
Andelman, SJ ;
Fagan, WF .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (11) :5954-5959
[2]  
Andreassian B, 1997, ANN CARDIOL ANGEIOL, V46, P171
[3]  
Angelstam Per, 1997, Ecological Bulletins, V46, P140
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2 RED DATA BOOK FINL
[5]   ENVIRONMENTAL REPRESENTATIVENESS - REGIONAL PARTITIONING AND RESERVE SELECTION [J].
BELBIN, L .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1993, 66 (03) :223-230
[6]   Incorporating connectivity into reserve selection procedures [J].
Briers, RA .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2002, 103 (01) :77-83
[7]   Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem [J].
Church, RL ;
Stoms, DM ;
Davis, FW .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1996, 76 (02) :105-112
[8]   Support system development for forest ecosystem management [J].
Church, RL ;
Murray, AT ;
Figueroa, MA ;
Barber, KH .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2000, 121 (02) :247-258
[9]   A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon [J].
Csuti, B ;
Polasky, S ;
Williams, PH ;
Pressey, RL ;
Camm, JD ;
Kershaw, M ;
Kiester, AR ;
Downs, B ;
Hamilton, R ;
Huso, M ;
Sahr, K .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1997, 80 (01) :83-97
[10]   Edge effects on an epiphytic lichen in fragmented forests [J].
Esseen, PA ;
Renhorn, KE .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1998, 12 (06) :1307-1317