BI-RADS for sonography: Positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features

被引:256
作者
Hong, AS [1 ]
Rosen, EL [1 ]
Soo, MS [1 ]
Baker, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.184.4.01841260
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of features described in the new sonographic BI-RADS lexicon for evaluating solid masses with known histologic diagnoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Sonograms of 403 solid lesions were analyzed by one of three dedicated breast radiologists. Each lesion was described using features from the sonographic BI-RADS lexicon. Lesion description and biopsy results were correlated. PPV and NPV were calculated. RESULTS. Histologic results showed that 141 (35%) of 403 masses were malignant. Sonographic BI-RADS descriptors showing high predictive value for malignancy include spiculated margin (86%,19/22), irregular shape (62%,102/164), and nonparallel orientation (69%,75/109). Sonographic BI-RADS descriptors highly predictive of benign lesions include circumscribed margin (90%,160/178), parallel orientation (78%, 228/294), and oval shape (84%,200/237). For the sonographic BI-RADS features of mass margin, shape, orientation, lesion boundary, echo pattern, and posterior acoustic features, descriptors chosen were significantly (p < 0.001) different for malignant and benign masses. CONCLUSION. Descriptors from the new sonographic BI-RADS lexicon can be useful in differentiating benign from malignant solid masses.
引用
收藏
页码:1260 / 1265
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, BREAST IM REP DAT SY
[2]   Sonography of solid breast lesions: Observer variability of lesion description and assessment [J].
Baker, JA ;
Kornguth, PJ ;
Soo, MS ;
Walsh, R ;
Mengoni, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (06) :1621-1625
[3]   BREAST-CANCER - PREDICTION WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK-BASED ON BI-RADS STANDARDIZED LEXICON [J].
BAKER, JA ;
KORNGUTH, PJ ;
LO, JY ;
WILLIFORD, ME ;
FLOYD, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 196 (03) :817-822
[4]  
Berube M, 1998, CAN ASSOC RADIOL J, V49, P223
[5]   MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURE ANALYSIS [J].
DORSI, CJ ;
KOPANS, DB .
SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 1993, 28 (03) :204-230
[6]   Sonography of the breast: Controversies and opinions [J].
Hall, FM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (06) :1635-1636
[7]   ULTRASOUND IN THE EVALUATION OF SOLID BREAST MASSES [J].
HARPER, AP ;
KELLYFRY, E ;
NOE, JS ;
BIES, JR ;
JACKSON, VP .
RADIOLOGY, 1983, 146 (03) :731-736
[8]   MANAGEMENT OF SOLID BREAST NODULES - WHAT IS THE ROLE OF SONOGRAPHY [J].
JACKSON, VP .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 196 (01) :14-15
[9]  
KOPANS DB, 1992, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V30, P257
[10]   The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: Positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories [J].
Liberman, L ;
Abramson, AF ;
Squires, FB ;
Glassman, JR ;
Morris, EA ;
Dershaw, DD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (01) :35-40