Effect of surgical margin status on survival and site of recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases

被引:993
作者
Pawlik, TM
Scoggins, CR
Zorzi, D
Abdalla, EK
Andres, A
Eng, C
Curley, SA
Loyer, EM
Muratore, A
Mentha, G
Capussotti, L
Vauthey, JN
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gastrointestinal Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Inst Res & Cure Canc, Surg Oncol Unit, Candiolo, Italy
[5] Univ Hosp Geneva, Div Digest Surg, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.sla.0000160703.75808.7d
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the influence of surgical margin status on survival and site of recurrence in patients treated with hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Methods: Using a multicenter database, 557 patients who underwent hepatic resection for colorectal metastases were identified. Demographics, operative data, pathologic margin status, site of recurrence (margin, other intrahepatic site, extrahepatic), and long-term survival data were collected and analyzed. Results: On final pathologic analysis, margin status was positive in 45 patients, and negative by 1 to 4 mm in 129, 5 to 9 mm in 85, and >= 1 cm in 298. At a median follow-up of 29 months, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rates were 97%, 74%, and 58%; median survival was 74 months. Tumor size >= 5 cm, > 3 tumor nodules, and carcinoembryonic antigen level > 200 ng/mL predicted poor survival (all P < 0.05). Median survival was 49 months in patients with positive margins and not yet reached in patients with negative margins (P = 0.01). After hepatic resection, 225 (40.4%) patients had recurrence: 21 at the surgical margin, 56 at another intrahepatic site, 82 at an extrahepatic site, and 66 at both intrahepatic and extrahepatic sites. Patients with negative margins of 1 to 4 mm, 5 to 9 mm, and >= 1 cm had similar overall recurrence rates (P > 0.05). Patients with positive margins were more likely to have surgical margin recurrence (P = 0.003). Adverse preoperative biologic factors including tumor number greater than 3 (P = 0.01) and a preoperative CEA level greater than 200 ng/mL (P = 0.04) were associated with an increased risk of positive surgical margin. Conclusions: A positive margin after resection of hepatic colorectal metastases is associated with adverse biologic factors and increased risk of surgical-margin recurrence. The width of a negative surgical margin does not affect survival, recurrence risk, or site of recurrence. A predicted margin of < 1 cm after resection of hepatic colorectal metastases should not be used as an exclusion criterion for resection.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 724
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Abdalla EK, 2004, ANN SURG, V239, P818, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000128305.90650.71
[2]  
Adam R, 2004, ANN SURG, V240, P644, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000141198.92114.16
[3]  
Adam R, 2001, ANN SURG ONCOL, V8, P347
[4]  
ADSON MA, 1984, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V119, P647
[5]  
Altendorf-Hofmann Annelore, 2003, Surg Oncol Clin N Am, V12, P165, DOI 10.1016/S1055-3207(02)00091-1
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, HPB, DOI DOI 10.1080/136518202760378489
[7]   PATTERNS OF FAILURE FOLLOWING SURGICAL RESECTION OF COLORECTAL-CANCER LIVER METASTASES - RATIONALE FOR A MULTIMODAL APPROACH [J].
BOZZETTI, F ;
BIGNAMI, P ;
MORABITO, A ;
DOCI, R ;
GENNARI, L .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1987, 205 (03) :264-270
[8]  
BUTLER J, 1986, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V162, P109
[9]   Surgical margin in hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis - A critical and improvable determinant of outcome [J].
Cady, B ;
Jenkins, RL ;
Steele, GD ;
Lewis, WD ;
Stone, MD ;
McDermott, WV ;
Jessup, JM ;
Bothe, A ;
Lalor, P ;
Lovett, EJ ;
Lavin, P ;
Linehan, DC .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 227 (04) :566-571
[10]   Trends in long-term survival following liver resection for hepatic colorectal metastases [J].
Choti, MA ;
Sitzmann, JV ;
Tiburi, MF ;
Sumetchotimetha, W ;
Rangsin, R ;
Schulick, RD ;
Lillemoe, KD ;
Yeo, CJ ;
Cameron, JL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 235 (06) :759-765