Perceptual visual quality metrics: A survey

被引:717
作者
Lin, Weisi [1 ]
Kuo, C-C Jay [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Comp Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[2] Univ So Calif, Ming Hsieh Dept Elect Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[3] Univ So Calif, Signal & Image Proc Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
Human visual system (HVS); Vision-based model; Signal-driven model; Signal decomposition; Just-noticeable distortion; Visual attention; Common feature and artifact detection; Full reference; No reference; Reduced reference; JUST-NOTICEABLE-DISTORTION; FIDELITY-CRITERION; BLOCKING ARTIFACTS; NEURAL MECHANISMS; VIDEO; MODEL; CONTRAST; EDGE; DIFFERENCE; SHARPNESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvcir.2011.01.005
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Visual quality evaluation has numerous uses in practice, and also plays a central role in shaping many visual processing algorithms and systems, as well as their implementation, optimization and testing. In this paper, we give a systematic, comprehensive and up-to-date review of perceptual visual quality metrics (PVQMs) to predict picture quality according to human perception. Several frequently used computational modules (building blocks of PVQMs) are discussed. These include signal decomposition, just-noticeable distortion, visual attention, and common feature and artifact detection. Afterwards, different types of existing PVQMs are presented, and further discussion is given toward feature pooling, viewing condition, computer-generated signal and visual attention. Six often-used image metrics (namely SSIM, VSNR, IFC, VIF, MSVD and PSNR) are also compared with seven public image databases (totally 3832 test images). We highlight the most significant research work for each topic and provide the links to the extensive relevant literature. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 312
页数:16
相关论文
共 204 条
[1]  
AHUMADA AJ, 2001, P SPIE HUMAN VISION, V6, P4299
[2]  
AHUMADA AJ, 1992, SPIE P HUMAN VISION, V3, P365
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, IEEE INT C AC SPEECH
[4]  
[Anonymous], IEEE INT C IM PROC
[5]  
[Anonymous], A57 DATASET
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, MODERN IMAGE QUALITY
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Final report from the video quality experts group on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Final report from the video quality experts group on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment
[9]  
[Anonymous], 37 IEEE AS C SIGN SY
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2007, IEEE C COMP VIS PATT