Changes in academic work and the chair regime: The case of German business administration academics

被引:39
作者
Muller-Camen, M [1 ]
Salzgeber, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
academic work; academic careers; German business administration; German universities; research evaluation;
D O I
10.1177/0170840605049802
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Today universities around the world are becoming subject to audits and evaluations that not only open them to outside scrutiny, but also force them to compete with each other for students, staff and funding. This development is supposed to lead to radical changes to academic work in business schools. Whereas there is an intensive debate about this issue in the UK, much less is known about changes in higher education in other European countries. This paper will show through the example of German business administration academics that similar pressures might not lead to similar outcomes. In the German system, hierarchy will remain more important than the market for academic work. Although role conflicts seem to increase for academics at all hierarchical levels, the traditional regime is likely to resist any far-reaching changes.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 290
页数:20
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [1] ALBERS S, 1999, BETRIEBSWIRTSCHAFT, V59, P583
  • [2] [Anonymous], KERN VERROTTET FUNF
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1997, SCANDINAVIAN J MANAG, DOI DOI 10.1016/s0956-5221(97)00022-5
  • [4] [Anonymous], NEW HIGHER ED ISSUES
  • [5] [Anonymous], CRITICAL CONSULTING
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2001, ACAD STAFF EUROPE CH
  • [7] BACKESGELLNER U, 1992, Z PERSONALFORSCH, V4, P403
  • [8] BARTOLKE K, 2000, JAHRHUNDERT INTERDEP, P77
  • [9] BERGER W, 1998, ORGANISATION PHILOS
  • [10] The state of the field in UK management research: Reflections of the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) panel
    Bessant, J
    Birley, S
    Cooper, C
    Dawson, S
    Gennard, J
    Gardiner, M
    Gray, A
    Jones, P
    Mayer, C
    McGee, J
    Pidd, M
    Rowley, G
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2003, 14 (01) : 51 - 68