Differential learning and interaction in alliance dynamics: A process and outcome discrepancy model

被引:228
作者
Kumar, R [1 ]
Nti, KO
机构
[1] Aarhus Sch Business, DK-8210 Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Penn State Univ, Smeal Coll Business Adm, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
alliance dynamics; differential learning; process and; outcome discrepancies;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.9.3.356
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Our paper develops a dynamic theory of alliances by examining certain outcome and process discrepancies that may emerge as the partners interact, highlighting issues that are especially relevant in knowledge intensive alliances, such as joint R&D or product development. Firms enter into these types of alliances to create economic value and to acquire knowledge to enhance their competencies. The degree to which the partners can realize their objectives is dependent on their absorptive capacities and the collaborative strategies adopted by the partners. Outcome and process discrepancies may emerge as collaboration unfolds. Outcome discrepancies concern the ability of the partners to achieve their economic and learning objectives. Process discrepancies relate to the partners' satisfaction with the pattern of interaction, and affect their feelings of psychological attachment to the relationship. How the partners assess and react to discrepancies shapes the developmental path of an alliance. The alliance flourishes in certain states but may collapse in others as the collaboration is subjected to environmental changes or shifts in the grand strategies of the partners. Guidelines for assessing and managing outcome and process discrepancies are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 367
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   HISTORY AND SOCIOLOGY - THE LOST SYNTHESIS [J].
ABBOTT, A .
SOCIAL SCIENCE HISTORY, 1991, 15 (02) :201-238
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Organizational learning, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.1985.4279103
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, SOC JUSTICE RES
[4]   Learning from failure: Towards an evolutionary model of collaborative ventures [J].
Arino, A ;
de la Torre, J .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1998, 9 (03) :306-325
[5]   INFORMATION ASYMMETRY, ADVERSE SELECTION AND JOINT-VENTURES - THEORY AND EVIDENCE [J].
BALAKRISHNAN, S ;
KOZA, MP .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1993, 20 (01) :99-117
[6]   INTERORGANIZATIONAL NETWORK AS A POLITICAL-ECONOMY [J].
BENSON, JK .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1975, 20 (02) :229-249
[7]   IS YOUR FIRM A CREATIVE DESTROYER - COMPETITIVE LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE FLOWS IN THE TECHNOLOGICAL STRATEGIES OF FIRMS [J].
BOISOT, MH .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1995, 24 (04) :489-506
[8]  
Carver C. S., 1981, Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior
[9]  
Cauley de la Sierra M., 1995, Managing global alliances: Key steps for successful collaboration
[10]   FORTUNE FAVORS THE PREPARED FIRM [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1994, 40 (02) :227-251