Multi-institutional phase I/II trial of oral bexarotene in combination with cisplatin and vinorelbine in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

被引:106
作者
Khuri, FR
Rigas, JR
Figlin, RA
Gralla, RJ
Shin, DM
Munden, R
Fox, N
Huyghe, MR
Kean, Y
Reich, SD
Hong, WK
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Thorac Head & Neck Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[5] Ligand Pharmaceut Inc, San Diego, CA USA
[6] Alton Ochsner Med Fdn & Ochsner Clin, Dept Med Oncol, New Orleans, LA 70121 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2001.19.10.2626
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Bexarotene (Targretin; Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, CA) is a retinoid-X-receptor (RXR)-selective retinoid with preclinical antitumor activity in squamous cell cancers. In this phase I/II trial, we combined bexarotene with cisplatin and vinorelbine in the treatment of patients with non-small-cell rung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: Forty-three patients who had stage IIIB NSCLC with pleural effusion or stage IV NSCLC and hold received no prior therapy received bexarotene in combination with cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)) and vinorelbine (alternating doses of 30 mg/m(2) and 15 mg/m(2)). In the phase I portion, the daily dose of bexarotene was escalated in cohorts of three patients from 150 mg/m(2) to 600 mg/m(2), beginning 1 week before the start of the cisplatin-vinorelbine regimen, Once the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of bexarotene wars determined, the study entered the phase II portion. Response rate was the primary end point; median survival time and 1-year survival rate were secondary end paints. Results: In the phase I portion, the daily MTD of bexarotene was determined to be 400 mg/m2. Eight of 43 patients exhibited major responses. Seven (25%) of the 28 patients in the phase II portion responded to treat\ment. The median survival time in the phase II portion was 14 months; nine (32%) of the 28 patients were still alive at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. One-year and projected 3-year survival rates were 61% and 30%, respectively. The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were hyperlipemia, leukopenia, nausea, vomiting, pneumonia, dyspnea, anemia, and asthenia. Grade 3 and 4 laboratory abnormalities with incidences greater than 5% were decreased hemoglobin levels and WBC, absolute neutrophil, and absolute lymphocyte counts and increased prothrombin time and creatinine and amylase levels. Of the two cases of pancreatitis, one required hospitalization and both were associated with increased triglyceride levels. There was one death secondary to renal insufficiency unrelated to bexarotene treatment, Conclusion: In patients with advanced NSCLC, bexarotene with cisplatin and vinorelbine yielded acceptable phase II response rates (25%) and was associated with better-than-expected survival (14-month median survival time; 61% I-year, 32% 2-year, and 30% projected 3-year survival rates). The regimen should be studied in larger clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:2626 / 2637
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], LUNG CANC PRINCIPLES
[2]   PREVENTION OF 2ND PRIMARY TUMORS WITH ISOTRETINOIN IN PATIENTS WITH SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE HEAD AND NECK - LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP [J].
BENNER, SE ;
PAJAK, TF ;
LIPPMAN, SM ;
EARLEY, C ;
HONG, WK .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1994, 86 (02) :140-141
[3]  
Bischoff ED, 1998, CANCER RES, V58, P479
[4]   SYNTHESIS AND STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY-RELATIONSHIPS OF NOVEL RETINOID-X RECEPTOR-SELECTIVE RETINOIDS [J].
BOEHM, MF ;
ZHANG, L ;
BADEA, BA ;
WHITE, SK ;
MAIS, DE ;
BERGER, E ;
SUTO, CM ;
GOLDMAN, ME ;
HEYMAN, RA .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1994, 37 (18) :2930-2941
[5]   Comparison of survival and quality of life in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with two dose levels of paclitaxel combined with cisplatin versus etoposide with cisplatin: Results of an eastern cooperative oncology group trial [J].
Bonomi, P ;
Kim, KM ;
Fairclough, D ;
Cella, D ;
Kugler, J ;
Rowinsky, E ;
Jiroutek, M ;
Johnson, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (03) :623-631
[6]   CISPLATIN CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE MITOMYCIN COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY WITH SUPPORTIVE CARE VERSUS SUPPORTIVE CARE ALONE FOR TREATMENT OF METASTATIC NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER [J].
CARTEI, G ;
CARTEI, F ;
CANTONE, A ;
CAUSARANO, D ;
GENCO, G ;
TOBALDIN, A ;
INTERLANDI, G ;
GIRALDI, T .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (10) :794-800
[7]  
CASTAIGNE S, 1990, BLOOD, V76, P1704
[8]   A decade of molecular biology of retinoic acid receptors [J].
Chambon, P .
FASEB JOURNAL, 1996, 10 (09) :940-954
[9]   THE STEROID AND THYROID-HORMONE RECEPTOR SUPERFAMILY [J].
EVANS, RM .
SCIENCE, 1988, 240 (4854) :889-895
[10]   RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF CISPLATIN PLUS FLUOROURACIL AND CARBOPLATIN PLUS FLUOROURACIL VERSUS METHOTREXATE IN ADVANCED SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE HEAD AND NECK - A SOUTHWEST-ONCOLOGY-GROUP STUDY [J].
FORASTIERE, AA ;
METCH, B ;
SCHULLER, DE ;
ENSLEY, JF ;
HUTCHINS, LF ;
TRIOZZI, P ;
KISH, JA ;
MCCLURE, S ;
VONFELDT, E ;
WILLIAMSON, SK ;
VONHOFF, DD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 10 (08) :1245-1251