Generalized linear mixed model with a penalized Gaussian mixture as a random effects distribution

被引:39
作者
Komarek, Arnost [1 ]
Lesaffre, Emmanuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Ctr Biostat, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.csda.2007.10.024
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Generalized linear mixed models are popular for regressing a discrete response when there is clustering, e.g. in longitudinal studies or in hierarchical data structures. It is standard to assume that the random effects have a normal distribution. Recently, it has been examined whether wrongly assuming a normal distribution for the random effects is important for the estimation of the fixed effects parameters. While it has been shown that misspecifying the distribution of the random effects has a minor effect in the context of linear mixed models, the conclusion for generalized mixed models is less clear. Some studies report a minor impact, while others report that the assumption of normality really matters especially when the variance of the random effect is relatively high. Since it is unclear whether the normality assumption is truly satisfied in practice, it is important that generalized mixed models are available which relax the normality assumption. A replacement of the normal distribution with a mixture of Gaussian distributions specified on a grid whereby only the weights of the mixture components are estimated using a penalized approach ensuring a smooth distribution for the random effects is proposed. The parameters of the model are estimated in a Bayesian context using MCMC techniques. The usefulness of the approach is illustrated on two longitudinal studies using R-functions. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3441 / 3458
页数:18
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Examples in which misspecification of a random effects distribution reduces efficiency, and possible remedies [J].
Agresti, A ;
Caffo, B ;
Ohman-Strickland, P .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2004, 47 (03) :639-653
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Bayesian Data Analysis
[3]   BAYESIAN COMPUTATION AND STOCHASTIC-SYSTEMS [J].
BESAG, J ;
GREEN, P ;
HIGDON, D ;
MENGERSEN, K .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 1995, 10 (01) :3-41
[4]  
BOGAERTS K, 2007, UNPUB ESTIMATING LOC
[5]   Negative binomial loglinear mixed models [J].
Booth, JG ;
Casella, G ;
Friedl, H ;
Hobert, JP .
STATISTICAL MODELLING, 2003, 3 (03) :179-191
[6]   APPROXIMATE INFERENCE IN GENERALIZED LINEAR MIXED MODELS [J].
BRESLOW, NE ;
CLAYTON, DG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 88 (421) :9-25
[7]   A semiparametric Bayesian model for randomised block designs [J].
Bush, CA ;
MacEachern, SN .
BIOMETRIKA, 1996, 83 (02) :275-285
[8]   RANDOM EFFECTS MODELS WITH NONPARAMETRIC PRIORS [J].
BUTLER, SM ;
LOUIS, TA .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1992, 11 (14-15) :1981-2000
[9]   Flexible random intercept models for binary outcomes using mixtures of normals [J].
Caffo, Brian ;
An, Ming-Wen ;
Rohde, Charles .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2007, 51 (11) :5220-5235
[10]   A Monte Carlo EM algorithm for generalized linear mixed models with flexible random effects distribution [J].
Chen, JL ;
Zhang, DW ;
Davidian, M .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2002, 3 (03) :347-360