Why fishing magnifies fluctuations in fish abundance

被引:547
作者
Anderson, Christian N. K. [1 ]
Hsieh, Chih-Hao [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sandin, Stuart A. [1 ]
Hewitt, Roger [5 ]
Hollowed, Anne [6 ]
Beddington, John [7 ]
May, Robert M. [8 ]
Sugihara, George [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Kyoto Univ, Ctr Ecol Res, Otsu, Shiga 5202113, Japan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Inst Oceanog, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
[4] Natl Taiwan Ocean Univ, Inst Marine Environm Chem & Ecol, Chilung 20224, Taiwan
[5] Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, SW Fisheries Sci Ctr, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[6] NOAA, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Alaska Fisheries Sci Ctr, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
[7] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Div Biol, Fac Nat Sci, London SW7 2AZ, England
[8] Univ Oxford, Dept Zool, Oxford OX1 3PS, England
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
D O I
10.1038/nature06851
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
It is now clear that fished populations can fluctuate more than unharvested stocks. However, it is not clear why. Here we distinguish among three major competing mechanisms for this phenomenon, by using the 50- year California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations ( CalCOFI) larval fish record. First, variable fishing pressure directly increases variability in exploited populations. Second, commercial fishing can decrease the average body size and age of a stock, causing the truncated population to track environmental fluctuations directly. Third, age- truncated or juvenescent populations have increasingly unstable population dynamics because of changing demographic parameters such as intrinsic growth rates. We find no evidence for the first hypothesis, limited evidence for the second and strong evidence for the third. Therefore, in California Current fisheries, increased temporal variability in the population does not arise from variable exploitation, nor does it reflect direct environmental tracking. More fundamentally, it arises from increased instability in dynamics. This finding has implications for resource management as an empirical example of how selective harvesting can alter the basic dynamics of exploited populations, and lead to unstable booms and busts that can precede systematic declines in stock levels.
引用
收藏
页码:835 / 839
页数:5
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], CALIF COOP OCEANIC F
  • [2] ARMSTRONG M, 2006, 200607 FISH SCI PART
  • [3] HARVESTING NATURAL-POPULATIONS IN A RANDOMLY FLUCTUATING ENVIRONMENT
    BEDDINGTON, JR
    MAY, RM
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1977, 197 (4302) : 463 - 465
  • [4] Berkeley SA, 2004, FISHERIES, V29, P23, DOI 10.1577/1548-8446(2004)29[23:FSVPOA]2.0.CO
  • [5] 2
  • [6] Bobko SJ, 2004, FISH B-NOAA, V102, P418
  • [7] Sustaining fisheries yields over evolutionary time scales
    Conover, DO
    Munch, SB
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5578) : 94 - 96
  • [8] Episodic fluctuations in larval supply
    Dixon, PA
    Milicich, MJ
    Sugihara, G
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1999, 283 (5407) : 1528 - 1530
  • [9] Gunderson D.R., 1993, SURVEYS FISHERIES RE
  • [10] Ecology, evolution and 1/f-noise
    Halley, JM
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1996, 11 (01) : 33 - 37