Treatment of young subjects at high familial risk of future hypertension with an angiotensin-receptor blocker

被引:40
作者
Skov, Karin
Eiskjaer, Hans
Hansen, Hans Erik
Madsen, Jens Kristian
Kvist, Stinne
Mulvany, Michael John
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Pharmacol, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Nephrol, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Viborg Cty Hosp, Dept Med, Viborg, Denmark
关键词
familial hypertension; prophylactic treatment; angiotensin II receptor blocker; randomized clinical trial; renal vascular resistance; left ventricular mass;
D O I
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.089532
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100210 [外科学];
摘要
Offspring of hypertensive parents are at high risk of future hypertension and subsequent cardiovascular diseases. We investigated whether early treatment with an angiotensin-receptor blocker in young normotensive offspring of hypertensive parents persistently lowered blood pressure after treatment withdrawal, a possibility supported by animal studies. The study is an investigator-initiated, double-blind study of 110 healthy normotensive subjects aged 18 to 36 years where both parents have essential hypertension randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups: candesartan (Atacand, Astra Zeneca), 16 mg o.d. or placebo. The intervention period was 12 months, with 24 months of follow-up. Primary outcome was mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure recordings (mean AMBP) after 12 and 24 months follow-up and was based on intention to treat (n = 110). Secondary outcomes were changes during treatment in mean AMBP, left ventricular mass, renal hemodynamics, and adverse events during intervention and were based on those completing the intervention period (n = 105). Primary outcome: At 12 and 24 months follow-up, mean AMBP was not different to placebo. Secondary outcomes: After 12 months of intervention, mean AMBP was reduced: -3.9/-3.4 mm Hg for candesartan versus 0.3/0.6 mm Hg for placebo, P < 0.0001. Renal vascular resistance and left ventricular mass were also reduced (P = 0.0007, P = 0.019, respectively). There were no significant differences in adverse advents between the 2 groups. In conclusion, temporary treatment of subjects at high familial risk of future hypertension with an angiotensin receptor blocker is feasible, but the treatment had no persistent effect on blood pressure when treatment was withdrawn.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 95
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]
Andersen TF, 1999, DAN MED BULL, V46, P263
[2]
A new approach to assessing antihypertensive therapy:: effect of treatment on pulse pressure [J].
Asmar, P ;
Lacourcière, Y .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2000, 18 (11) :1683-1690
[3]
Prehypertension revisited [J].
Chobanian, Aram V. .
HYPERTENSION, 2006, 48 (05) :812-814
[4]
Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure [J].
Chobanian, AV ;
Bakris, GL ;
Black, HR ;
Cushman, WC ;
Green, LA ;
Izzo, JL ;
Jones, DW ;
Materson, BJ ;
Oparil, S ;
Wright, JT ;
Roccella, EJ .
HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) :1206-1252
[5]
Conen D, 2006, NEW ENGL J MED, V355, P417
[6]
Genes and family environment explain correlations between blood pressure and body mass index [J].
Cui, JS ;
Hopper, JL ;
Harrap, SB .
HYPERTENSION, 2002, 40 (01) :7-12
[7]
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC DETERMINATION OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR MASS IN MAN - ANATOMIC VALIDATION OF METHOD [J].
DEVEREUX, RB ;
REICHEK, N .
CIRCULATION, 1977, 55 (04) :613-618
[8]
Candesartan cilexetil - An update of its use in essential hypertension [J].
Easthope, SE ;
Jarvis, B .
DRUGS, 2002, 62 (08) :1253-1287
[9]
Candesartan cilexetil and renal hemodynamics in hypertensive patients [J].
Fridman, K ;
Wysocki, M ;
Friberg, P ;
Andersson, OK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2000, 13 (09) :1045-1048
[10]
AT1 receptor antagonist treatment caused persistent arterial functional changes in young spontaneously hypertensive rats [J].
Gillies, LK ;
Lu, M ;
Wang, H ;
Lee, RMKW .
HYPERTENSION, 1997, 30 (06) :1471-1478