Increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) over time and by birth cohort - Kaiser permanente of Colorado GDM screening program

被引:516
作者
Dabelea, D
Snell-Bergeon, JK
Hartsfield, CL
Bischoff, KJ
Hamman, RF
McDuffie, RS
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Prevent Med & Biometr, Denver, CO 80262 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente, Colorado Clin Res Unit, Denver, CO USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente Colorado Perinatol, Denver, CO USA
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diacare.28.3.579
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) varies in direct proportion with the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in a given population or ethnic group. Given that the number of people with diabetes worldwide is expected to increase at record levels through 2030, we examined temporal trends in GDM among diverse ethnic groups. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Kaiser Permanente of Colorado (KPCO) has used a standard protocol to universally screen for GDM since 1994. This report is based on 36,403 KPCO singleton pregnancies occurring between 1994 and 2002 and examines trends in GDM prevalence among women with diverse ethnic backgrounds. RESULTS - The prevalence of GDM among KPCb members doubled from 1994 to 2002 (2.1-4.1%, P < 0.001), with significant increases in all racial/ethnic groups. In logistic regression, year of diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] and 95% CI per 1 year = 1.12 [1,09-1.14]), mother's age (OR per 5 years = 1.7 [1.6-1.8]) and ethnicity other than non-Hispanic white (OR - 2.1 [1.9-2.4]) were all significantly associated with GDM. Birth year remained significant (OR 1.06, P = 0.006), even after adjusting for prior GDM history. CONCLUSIONS - This study shows that the prevalence of GDM is increasing in a universally screened multiethnic population. The increasing GDM prevalence suggests that the vicious cycle of diabetes in pregnancy initially described among Pima Indians may also be occurring among other U.S. ethnic groups.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 584
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Agresti A., 1990, Analysis of categorical data
  • [2] Ahluwalia Indu B, 2003, MMWR Surveill Summ, V52, P1
  • [3] Amer Diabet Assoc, 2000, DIABETES CARE, V23, pS77
  • [4] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2001, Obstet Gynecol, V98, P709
  • [5] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins--Obstetrics, 2001, Obstet Gynecol, V98, P525
  • [6] Lessons learned: Patient strategies for a type 2 diabetes intervention in a primary care setting
    Amthauer, H
    Gaglio, B
    Glasgow, RE
    Dortch, W
    King, DK
    [J]. DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2003, 29 (04) : 673 - 681
  • [7] INCIDENCE AND SEVERITY OF GESTATIONAL DIABETES-MELLITUS ACCORDING TO COUNTRY OF BIRTH IN WOMEN LIVING IN AUSTRALIA
    BEISCHER, NA
    OATS, JN
    HENRY, OA
    SHEEDY, MT
    WALSTAB, JE
    [J]. DIABETES, 1991, 40 : 35 - 38
  • [8] RACE ETHNICITY AND OTHER RISK-FACTORS FOR GESTATIONAL DIABETES
    BERKOWITZ, GS
    LAPINSKI, RH
    WEIN, R
    LEE, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 135 (09) : 965 - 973
  • [9] BRESLOW NE, 1987, IARC SCI PUBL, V82
  • [10] Caplan LS, 2003, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V12, P1182