Impact of the MELD score on waiting time and disease severity in liver transplantation in united states veterans

被引:45
作者
Ahmad, Jawad
Downey, Kathy K.
Akoad, Mohamed
Cacciarelli, Thomas V.
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] VAPHS, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/lt.21262
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Organ allocation for liver transplantation (LT) in the United States is based on the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. The MELD score prioritizes organ distribution to sicker patients. There is limited data on the effect of this policy on transplantation in the Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the MELD score on U.S. veteran patients undergoing LT. Comparison of MELD scores and waiting time of LT recipients before and after the introduction of the MELD system was done. A total of 192 LT recipients were analyzed. Blood type, diagnosis, listing MELD score, and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score at transplant did not differ although MELD era recipients were older (mean 54.3 vs. 51.3 yr, P = 0.009). Mean waiting time decreased from 461 days (pre-MELD) to 252 days (MELD era) (P = 0.004). Mean MELD score at LT increased from 23.4 (MELD era) compared to 20.3 (pre-MELD) (P = 0.01). In conclusion, waiting time for LT in U.S. veterans has decreased significantly in the MELD era. The MELD score of patients transplanted in the MELD era is significantly higher and patients are still being listed at a high MELD score. The MELD system has lead to sicker veterans being transplanted with shorter waiting times.
引用
收藏
页码:1564 / 1569
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   HEPATITIS-C VIRUS-INFECTION IN POSTTRANSFUSION HEPATITIS - AN ANALYSIS WITH 1ST-GENERATION AND 2ND-GENERATION ASSAYS [J].
AACH, RD ;
STEVENS, CE ;
HOLLINGER, FB ;
MOSLEY, JW ;
PETERSON, DA ;
TAYLOR, PE ;
JOHNSON, RG ;
BARBOSA, LH ;
NEMO, GJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 325 (19) :1325-1329
[2]   The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, 1988 through 1994 [J].
Alter, MJ ;
Kruszon-Moran, D ;
Nainan, OV ;
McQuillan, GM ;
Gao, FX ;
Moyer, LA ;
Kaslow, RA ;
Margolis, HS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (08) :556-562
[3]   Comparative analysis of outcome following liver transplantation in US veterans [J].
Austin, GL ;
Sasaki, AW ;
Zaman, A ;
Rabkin, JM ;
Olyaei, A ;
Ruimy, R ;
Orloff, SL ;
Ham, J ;
Rosen, HR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (05) :788-795
[4]   Access to liver transplantation: Can we do a better job? [J].
Cacciarelli, TV .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 11 (11) :1318-1319
[5]   Limited success of HCV antiviral therapy in United States veterans [J].
Cawthorne, CH ;
Rudat, KR ;
Burton, MS ;
Brown, KE ;
Luxon, BA ;
Janney, CG ;
Fimmel, CJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (01) :149-155
[6]   Elevated prevalence of hepatitis C infection in users of United States Veterans medical centers [J].
Dominitz, JA ;
Boyko, EJ ;
Koepsell, TD ;
Heagerty, PJ ;
Maynard, C ;
Sporleder, JL .
HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 41 (01) :88-96
[7]   Results of the first year of the new liver allocation plan [J].
Freeman, RB ;
Wiesner, RH ;
Edwards, E ;
Harper, A ;
Merion, R ;
Wolfe, R .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (01) :7-15
[8]   Orthotopic liver transplantation in high-risk patients - Risk factors associated with mortality and infectious morbidity [J].
Gayowski, T ;
Marino, IR ;
Singh, N ;
Doyle, H ;
Wagener, M ;
Fung, JJ ;
Starzl, TE .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 65 (04) :499-504
[9]   Evaluation for liver transplantation: Adherence to AASLD referral guidelines in a large Veterans Affairs Center [J].
Julapalli, VR ;
Kramer, JR ;
El-Serag, HB .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 11 (11) :1370-1378
[10]  
Morelli J, 2002, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V97, P2379