A conceptual framework to assess the effects of environmental change on ecosystem services

被引:154
作者
Rounsevell, M. D. A. [1 ]
Dawson, T. P. [2 ]
Harrison, P. A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Geosci, Ctr Study Environm Change & Sustainabil, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Southampton, Sch Geog, Southampton, Hants, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Ctr Environm, Environm Change Inst, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
关键词
Ecosystem services; Environmental change; DPSIR; Drivers and pressures; Social-ecological systems; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CROP POLLINATION; LAND-USE; REQUIREMENTS; ADAPTATION; BIODIVERSITY; MITIGATION; VALUATION; DIVERSITY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s10531-010-9838-5
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
A new conceptual framework is presented for the assessment of the impacts of environmental change drivers on ecosystem service provision and the policy and management responses that would derive from the valuation of these impacts. The Framework for Ecosystem Service Provision (FESP), is based on an interpretation of the widely-used Drivers-Pressures-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework. FESP differs from the DPSIR by offering clarity in the definitions of the various DPSIR components as well as introducing novel elements of relevance to the ecosystem service approach. The value of a common framework lies in making the comparison across competing services accessible and clear as well as highlighting the conflicts and trade-offs between not only multiple ecosystem services, but also multiple service beneficiaries. The framework is explicit, for example, in recognising as state variables not only the attributes of the Ecosystem Service Providers (ESPs), but also the attributes of the Ecosystem Service Beneficiaries (ESBs). That a service depends as much on the attributes of the people whose well-being benefits from the service as on the attributes of the biology providing the service is an important step in integrated social-ecological thinking. FESP also identifies the mechanisms of either mitigation or adaptation to the environmental change problem through the effect of these response strategies on specific pressure or state variables. In this way, FESP can contribute to the policies and strategies that are used to support conservation management. This paper describes the principles of FESP and presents some indicative examples of its practical implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:2823 / 2842
页数:20
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Adapting food systems of the Indo-Gangetic plains to global environmental change: key information needs to improve policy formulation [J].
Aggarwal, PK ;
Joshi, PK ;
Ingram, JSI ;
Gupta, RK .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2004, 7 (06) :487-498
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Europe's environment: The Dobris Assessment
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, OVERVIEW ADAPTIVE CA
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Environmental indicators: Typology and Overview
[6]  
[Anonymous], ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
[7]   Adaptation, spatial heterogeneity, and the vulnerability of agricultural systems to climate change and CO2 fertilization:: An integrated assessment approach [J].
Antle, JM ;
Capalbo, SM ;
Elliott, ET ;
Paustian, KH .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2004, 64 (03) :289-315
[8]  
Barron J., 2009, Rainwater harvesting: A lifeline to human wellbeing
[9]  
Berkes F., 1998, LINKING SOCIAL ECOLO, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511541957
[10]   Farmland biodiversity and the footprint of agriculture [J].
Butler, S. J. ;
Vickery, J. A. ;
Norris, K. .
SCIENCE, 2007, 315 (5810) :381-384