A novel empirical free energy function that explains and predicts protein-protein binding affinities

被引:51
作者
Audie, Joseph [1 ]
Scarlata, Suzanne [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Phys & Biophys, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
free energy; protein docking; desolvation; computational; regression; transfer free energies;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpc.2007.05.021
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A free energy function can be defined as a mathematical expression that relates macroscopic free energy changes to microscopic or molecular properties. Free energy functions can be used to explain and predict the affinity of a ligand for a protein and to score and discriminate between native and non-native binding modes. However, there is a natural tension between developing a function fast enough to solve the scoring problem but rigorous enough to explain and predict binding affinities. Here, we present a novel, physics-based free energy function that is computationally inexpensive, yet explanatory and predictive. The function results from a derivation that assumes the cost of polar desolvation can be ignored and that includes a unique and implicit treatment of interfacial water-bridged interactions. The function was parameterized on an intemally consistent, high quality training set giving R-2 = 0.97 and Q(2) = 0.91. We used the function to blindly and successfully predict binding affinities for a diverse test set of 31 wild-type protein-protein and protein-peptide complexes (R-2 = 0.79, rmsd= 1.2 kcal mol(-1)). The function performed very well in direct comparison with a recently described knowledge-based potential and the function appears to be transferable. Our results indicate that our function is well suited for solving a wide range of protein/peptide design and discovery problems. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 211
页数:14
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] AJAY MMA, 1995, J MED CHEM, V38, P4953
  • [2] Åqvist J, 2001, COMB CHEM HIGH T SCR, V4, P613
  • [3] In search of the energetic role of peptide hydrogen bonds
    Baldwin, RL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 278 (20) : 17581 - 17588
  • [4] The Protein Data Bank and the challenge of structural genomics
    Berman, HM
    Bhat, TN
    Bourne, PE
    Feng, ZK
    Gilliland, G
    Weissig, H
    Westbrook, J
    [J]. NATURE STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2000, 7 (Suppl 11) : 957 - 959
  • [5] An analysis of conformational changes on protein-protein association: implications for predictive docking
    Betts, MJ
    Sternberg, MJE
    [J]. PROTEIN ENGINEERING, 1999, 12 (04): : 271 - 283
  • [6] The effect of multiple binding modes on empirical modeling of ligand docking to proteins
    Brem, R
    Dill, KA
    [J]. PROTEIN SCIENCE, 1999, 8 (05) : 1134 - 1143
  • [7] A protein-protein docking benchmark
    Chen, R
    Mintseris, J
    Janin, J
    Weng, ZP
    [J]. PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 2003, 52 (01): : 88 - 91
  • [8] CONTRIBUTION OF BURIED HYDROGEN-BONDS TO PROTEIN STABILITY - THE CRYSTAL-STRUCTURES OF 2 BARNASE MUTANTS
    CHEN, YW
    FERSHT, AR
    HENRICK, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1993, 234 (04) : 1158 - 1170
  • [9] Calculation of affinities of peptides for proteins
    Donnini, S
    Juffer, AH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 25 (03) : 393 - 411
  • [10] Bioactive peptides from libraries
    Falciani, C
    Lozzi, L
    Pini, A
    Bracci, L
    [J]. CHEMISTRY & BIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (04): : 417 - 426