Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes?: The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts

被引:191
作者
Berthold, Kirsten [1 ]
Nueckles, Matthias [1 ]
Renkl, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Dept Psychol Educ & Dev Psychol, D-79085 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
learning protocol; journal writing; learning strategies; cognitive learning strategies; metacognitive learning strategies; prompts;
D O I
10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.007
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Although writing learning protocols is an effective follow-up course work activity, many learners tend to do it in a rather suboptimal way. Hence, we analyzed the effects of instructional support in the form of prompts. The effects of different types of prompts were investigated in an experiment with four conditions: cognitive prompts, metacognitive prompts, a combination of cognitive and metacognitive prompts, or no prompts (N = 84 undergraduate psychology students). We found that the prompts stimulated the elicitation of cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies. The provision of purely metacognitive prompts did not, however, improve learning outcomes. Only the groups who had received cognitive, or a combination of cognitive and metacognitive, prompts learned more than the control group. This effect was mediated by cognitive learning strategies. The learners in the successful groups did not perceive the prompted learning strategies as more helpful than the learners of the group without prompts. It can be concluded that cognitive prompts-alone or in combination with metacognitive prompts-are an effective means to foster learning. However, additional means should be employed in order to convince the learner of the usefulness of such prompts. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 577
页数:14
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
ALAMARGOT D, 2001, THROUGH MODELS WRITI
[2]  
[Anonymous], LEARNING INSTRUCTION
[3]   WHAT IS LEARNED IN NOTE TAKING [J].
BARNETT, JE ;
DIVESTA, FJ ;
ROGOZINSKI, JT .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 73 (02) :181-192
[4]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[5]  
BEREITER C, 1980, COGNITIVE PROCESS, P3
[6]   STATISTICAL TREATMENT OF THE SOLOMON 4-GROUP DESIGN - A META-ANALYTIC APPROACH [J].
BRAVER, MCW ;
BRAVER, SL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 104 (01) :150-154
[7]  
Brown A., 1989, Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, P393
[8]   A study of the factors that influence physicians' commitments to change their practices using learning diaries [J].
Campbell, C ;
Parboosingh, J ;
Gondocz, T ;
Babitskaya, G ;
Pham, B .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1999, 74 (10) :S34-S36
[9]  
CANTRELL RJ, 2000, READING PSYCHOL, V21, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/027027100278310
[10]   SELF-EXPLANATIONS - HOW STUDENTS STUDY AND USE EXAMPLES IN LEARNING TO SOLVE PROBLEMS [J].
CHI, MTH ;
BASSOK, M ;
LEWIS, MW ;
REIMANN, P ;
GLASER, R .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 1989, 13 (02) :145-182