Impacts of acid gases on mercury oxidation across SCR catalyst

被引:134
作者
Zhuang, Ye [1 ]
Laumb, Jason [1 ]
Liggett, Richard [1 ]
Holmes, Mike [1 ]
Pavlish, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Dakota, Energy & Environm Res Ctr, Grand Forks, ND 58202 USA
关键词
mercury oxidation; SCR; coal; flue gas; acid gas;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.03.010
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
A series of bench-scale experiments were completed to evaluate acid gases of HCl, SO2, and SO3 on mercury oxidation across a commercial selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst. The SCR catalyst was placed in a simulated flue gas stream containing O-2, CO2, H2O, NO, NO2, and NH3, and N-2. HCl, S-2, and SO3 were added to the gas stream either separately or in combination to investigate their interactions with mercury over the SCR catalyst. The compositions of the simulated flue gas represent a medium-sulfur and low- to medium-chlorine coal that could represent either bituminous or subbituminous. The experimental data indicated that 5-50 ppm HCI in flue gas enhanced mercury oxidation within the SCR catalyst, possibly because of the reactive chlorine species formed through catalytic reactions. An addition of 5 ppm HCl in the simulated flue gas resulted in mercury oxidation of 45% across the SCR compared to only 4% mercury oxidation when 1 ppm HCl is in the flue gas. As HCl concentration increased to 50 ppm, 63% of Hg oxidation was reached. SO2 and SO3 showed a mitigating effect on mercury chlorination to some degree, depending on the concentrations Of SO2 and SO3, by competing against HCl for SCR adsorption sites. High levels of acid gases of HC1 (50 ppm), SO2 (2000 ppm), and SO3 (50 ppm) in the flue gas deteriorate mercury adsorption on the SCR catalyst. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V.. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 934
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
AFONSO RF, 2001, P COMB POW PLANT AIR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1858 EPA ICR
[3]  
Chu P., 2003, P COMB POW PLANT AIR
[4]   Fixed-bed studies of the interactions between mercury and coal combustion fly ash [J].
Dunham, GE ;
DeWall, RA ;
Senior, CL .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 82 (2-3) :197-213
[5]  
*EPA, 2002, STEAM GEN UN MERC EM
[6]  
Gutberlet H., 2000, EPRI SCR WORKSH MEMP
[7]  
Hocquel M, 2004, BEHAV FATE MERCURY C
[8]  
KAI K, 2006, P COMB POW PLANT AIR
[9]  
KILGROE J, 2003, P AIR QUAL 4 INT C M
[10]  
Laudal D., 2002, EFFECT SELECTIVE CAT