Helping Patients Decide: Ten Steps to Better Risk Communication

被引:423
作者
Fagerlin, Angela [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Ubel, Peter A. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ctr Bioeth & Social Sci Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Ann Arbor VA HSR & D, Ctr Clin Management Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Div Gen Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Hlth Educ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Risk Sci Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Duke Univ, Fuqua Sch Business, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[8] Duke Univ, Sanford Sch Publ Policy, Durham, NC USA
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2011年 / 103卷 / 19期
关键词
BREAST-CANCER; PREFERENCE REVERSALS; ADJUVANT THERAPY; HEALTH-RISK; INFORMATION; BENEFITS; PERCEPTIONS; NUMERACY; ABSOLUTE; FORMATS;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djr318
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
With increasing frequency, patients are being asked to make complex decisions about cancer screening, prevention, and treatment. These decisions are fraught with emotion and cognitive difficulty simultaneously. Many Americans have low numeracy skills making the cognitive demands even greater whenever, as is often the case, patients are presented with risk statistics and asked to make comparisons between the risks and benefits of multiple options and to make informed medical decisions. In this commentary, we highlight 10 methods that have been empirically shown to improve patients' understanding of risk and benefit information and/or their decision making. The methods range from presenting absolute risks using frequencies (rather than presenting relative risks) to using a risk format that clarifies how treatment changes risks from preexisting baseline levels to using plain language. We then provide recommendations for how health-care providers and health educators can best to communicate this complex medical information to patients, including using plain language, pictographs, and absolute risks instead of relative risks.
引用
收藏
页码:1436 / 1443
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]
Akl E, 2011, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, P1
[2]
Rethinking health numeracy: A multidisciplinary literature review [J].
Ancker, Jessica S. ;
Kaufman, David .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2007, 14 (06) :713-721
[3]
Design features of graphs in health risk communication: A systematic review [J].
Ancker, Jessica S. ;
Senathirajah, Yalini ;
Kukafka, Rita ;
Starren, Justin B. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2006, 13 (06) :608-618
[4]
[Anonymous], 93275 NCES US DEP ED
[5]
[Anonymous], HLTH LIT
[7]
COMPLETENESS OF REPORTING TRIAL RESULTS - EFFECT ON PHYSICIANS WILLINGNESS TO PRESCRIBE [J].
BOBBIO, M ;
DEMICHELIS, B ;
GIUSTETTO, G .
LANCET, 1994, 343 (8907) :1209-1211
[8]
RECENCY EFFECTS IN MEMORY, AS A FUNCTION OF MODALITY OF INTERVENING EVENTS [J].
BROADBENT, D ;
VINES, R ;
BROADBENT, M .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 1978, 40 (01) :5-13
[9]
Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: How presentation of recurrence risk influences decision-making [J].
Chao, C ;
Studts, JL ;
Abell, T ;
Hadley, T ;
Roetzer, L ;
Dineen, S ;
Lorenz, D ;
YoussefAgha, A ;
McMasters, KM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (23) :4299-4305
[10]
Complex interventions to improve the health of people with limited literacy: A systematic review [J].
Clement, Sarah ;
Ibrahim, Saima ;
Crichton, Nicola ;
Wolf, Michael ;
Rowlands, Gillian .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2009, 75 (03) :340-351