Modeling leaf area index from litter collection and tree data in a deciduous broadleaf forest

被引:38
作者
Ishihara, Masae Iwamoto [1 ]
Hiura, Tsutom [1 ]
机构
[1] Hokkaido Univ, Field Sci Ctr No Biosphere, Tomakomai Res Stn, Takaoka, Tomakomai 0530035, Japan
关键词
Leaf area index; Leaf mass per unit leaf area; Litter traps; Stem basal area; Spatial variability; DISPERSAL; LAI;
D O I
10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.02.007
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Leaf area index (LA!) is an important index in ecological and meteorological studies. The litter trap method is commonly used to measure LAI in deciduous forests. To reduce the time consumed in sorting leaf litterfall by species in the litter trap method, we developed four models to predict LAI using litter traps and tree census data. The local dominance model, which estimates the leaf litterfall amount of each species by their local dominance, predicted mean and spatial variability of LAI most accurately compared to the 2 models that did not take into account spatial heterogeneity of species distribution within a forest or the model that estimated litterfall amount from leaf dispersal function. Therefore, this model can be employed instead of sorting leaf litter by species. Furthermore, we found that leaf mass per area (LMA) of at least 10 dominant species are essential for accurate estimation of LAI. Present results suggest that spatial variability of LA! is mainly due to spatial variance of leaf litterfall followed by spatial heterogeneity of species distribution within a forest, and difference in LMA among species. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1016 / 1022
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Leaf area index from litter collection:: impact of specific leaf area variability within a beech stand [J].
Bouriaud, O ;
Soudani, K ;
Bréda, N .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 29 (03) :371-380
[2]   Ground-based measurements of leaf area index:: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies [J].
Bréda, NJJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2003, 54 (392) :2403-2417
[3]   A COMPARISON OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT METHODS FOR ESTIMATING FOREST CANOPY LEAF-AREA [J].
CHASON, JW ;
BALDOCCHI, DD ;
HUSTON, MA .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1991, 57 (1-3) :107-128
[4]   DEFINING LEAF-AREA INDEX FOR NON-FLAT LEAVES [J].
CHEN, JM ;
BLACK, TA .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1992, 15 (04) :421-429
[5]   Estimating LAI in deciduous forest stands [J].
Eriksson, H ;
Eklundh, L ;
Hall, K ;
Lindroth, A .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2005, 129 (1-2) :27-37
[6]   A spatially explicit model of leaf litter fall in hemlock-hardwood forests [J].
Ferrari, JB ;
Sugita, S .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1996, 26 (11) :1905-1913
[7]   Accuracy of the MacArthur-Horn method for estimating a foliage profile [J].
Fukushima, Y ;
Hiura, T ;
Tanabe, S .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1998, 92 (04) :203-210
[8]   Direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index, fAPAR, and net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems [J].
Gower, ST ;
Kucharik, CJ ;
Norman, JM .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 70 (01) :29-51
[9]   CANOPY DYNAMICS AND ABOVEGROUND PRODUCTION OF 5 TREE SPECIES WITH DIFFERENT LEAF LONGEVITIES [J].
GOWER, ST ;
REICH, PB ;
SON, Y .
TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 12 (04) :327-345
[10]  
Hiura T., 1998, Research Bulletin of the Hokkaido University Forests, V55, P1