Single vessel revascularization with beating heart techniques -: minithoracotomy or sternotomy?

Objective: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the best surgical approach in off-pump single vessel revascularization of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). Methods: In 256 patients a single left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to LAD bypass was performed with beating heart techniques through a left anterior minithoracotomy (minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB), n = 129) or a full sternotomy (off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB), n = 127). Results: In the OPCAB group, significantly more severe comorbidities (P = 0.001) and redo-operations were noted (P < 0.001). Conversion to sternotomy or CPB was necessary in five MIDCAB patients and one OPCAB patient. No cerebrovascular accident was seen in both groups. There was no hospital death in MIDCAB- and two deaths in OPCAB procedures (P = ns). There was a significant reduction in time of surgery (P = 0.028) and coronary occlusion (P = 0.009) in the OPCAB group. No differences in postoperative ventilation time, ICU stay and length of hospital stay were recorded between groups. Wound infections occurred in six MIDCAB patients (4.7%) and one OPCAB patient (0.8%). Early postoperative reoperation due to graft failure was necessary in three patients after MIDCAB and two patients after OPCAB (P = ns). Confirmed by angiography, the early graft patency rate was 96 and 98%, respectively (P = ns). Conclusions: Both beating heart techniques showed good results with low hospital mortality, low early complications and comparable angiographic results. Nevertheless, MIDCAB is a challenging technique as demonstrated by the longer times of surgery and coronary occlusion with a tendency towards a higher risk of conversion and would infection. Thus, this technique should only be performed in selected patients with favourable coronary anatomy. Through a sternotomy approach, single vessel revascularization can be performed safely off-pump even in high-risk patients. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.